Quantcast CFN 3 Year Rankings of College Football Programs - SECTalk Forums
SECTalk.com
SECTalk.com  SECTalk.com Boards  Login  Register 
13,702 Members | 996,986 Messages | 176 Users Online
News   Shop   Pick 'Ems   Shoutbox   Quick Links   Search   Today's Posts   New Posts   Link To Us
Go Back   SECTalk Forums > SEC Sports > SEC Football Talk
Reload this Page CFN 3 Year Rankings of College Football Programs
        

SEC Football Talk Talk about SEC Football here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2007, 04:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
GvilleDave's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 756
High Fived: 149 in 89 posts
Given High Fives: 248
GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all
Rep Power: 632
Auburn
GvilleDave is offline
Vandy CFN 3 Year Rankings of College Football Programs
4 of the top 10 programs are from the SEC!

#10 LSU
#7 Georgia
#6 Florida
#3 Auburn

No other conference had more than two teams.

Scout.com: CFN Three-Year Program Ranking - 1 to 10
"What we've got here is... failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it... well, he gets it. I don't like it any more than you men." from Cool Hand Luke
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 04:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
TigersFanTaylor's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 19
Posts: 1,059
High Fived: 0 in 0 posts
Given High Fives: 0
TigersFanTaylor is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 21
Send a message via AIM to TigersFanTaylor
TigersFanTaylor is offline
Default
Yes, those teams deserved it. Auburn should have played USCw in '04, and I really think they could have beat them.

Just another example of how dominant the SEC is!

If this was out of the past 10 years, UT-Knox would have made it.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 04:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Antartica
Age: 22
Posts: 3,279
High Fived: 0 in 0 posts
Given High Fives: 0
C_hris is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 0
Send a message via AIM to C_hris
C_hris is offline
Default
He said bad losses for Georgia are 0.

What dose he call Vanderbuilt and Kentucky LOL
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 04:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Seppeh's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Age: 19
Posts: 2,187
High Fived: 0 in 0 posts
Given High Fives: 0
Seppeh is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 34
Send a message via AIM to Seppeh
Seppeh is offline
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by C_hris View Post
What dose he call Vanderbuilt and Kentucky LOL
Law of averages. It happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by azamugg View Post
all you dawgs are in denial..................mark this post and bring it up in january...........UGA will be 8 - 4 pre-bowl
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilDawgDan View Post
Mark my words... I'm calling it now. USC does not go undefeated.
Reminders:
Pudding is very confident Kentucky will beat Georgia. Be sure to rub this in when they lose.
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 04:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
GvilleDave's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 756
High Fived: 149 in 89 posts
Given High Fives: 248
GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all GvilleDave is a name known to all
Rep Power: 632
Auburn
GvilleDave is offline
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by C_hris View Post
He said bad losses for Georgia are 0.

What dose he call Vanderbuilt and Kentucky LOL
According to the author: "Bad Losses: Losses to teams that finished with four wins or fewer, or any loss to a non D-I team."

Bad loss is a relative term. Although UGA & Arkansas are obviously good football teams I consider the beatdown you guys gave Auburn last year a "bad loss".
"What we've got here is... failure to communicate. Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it... well, he gets it. I don't like it any more than you men." from Cool Hand Luke
Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 04:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Seppeh's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Age: 19
Posts: 2,187
High Fived: 0 in 0 posts
Given High Fives: 0
Seppeh is an unknown quantity at this point
Rep Power: 34
Send a message via AIM to Seppeh
Seppeh is offline
Default
Yes, losing to a teams that won 9 and 10 games. Horrible losses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by azamugg View Post
all you dawgs are in denial..................mark this post and bring it up in january...........UGA will be 8 - 4 pre-bowl
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilDawgDan View Post
Mark my words... I'm calling it now. USC does not go undefeated.
Reminders:
Pudding is very confident Kentucky will beat Georgia. Be sure to rub this in when they lose.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

» Log in
User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
» Recent Threads
» Pick 'Ems
SEC Baseball
Week 5 closes
Thursday, Mar 18th at 10
NFL
Super Bowl closes
Saturday, Feb 6th at 10
SEC Basketball
Week 17 closes
Tuesday, Mar 2nd at 10
» Sponsors

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 AM.