Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The SEC's Premier Fan Site!
You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, pick 'ems, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!
If you have any problems registering, please contact us.
Other SEC Sports
Talk about Women's Basketball, Softball, Track, Hockey, and other SEC Sports here.
Is that list just men's sports? Or is it men's and women's combined?
It's a pretty meaningless award, Stanford has won it 14 years in a row. And I don't think they've ever won a championship during that time that anybody cared about. Most SEC schools don't offer many of the sports that the NCAA awards "points" for. These include: Bowling, Fencing, Field Hockey, Men's gymnastics, Ice hockey, Indoor track and field, Lacrosse, Rifle, Rowing, Skiing, men's soccer, men's volleyball, and men's and women's water polo.
That's nearly as many sports as most SEC schools have in total, so its easy to see why schools like Stanford where they delight in pretentious and gay sports do so well.
Is that list just men's sports? Or is it men's and women's combined?
It's all sports, men's and women's. It's called the Director's Cup for athletic directors. As D3 pointed out, it can be somewhat unfair, in that the entire athletic departments are ranked; so the schools with more sports (like Stanford) can remain at the top most of the time. Most SEC schools only have 18 sports or so. However, since all D1 schools don't offer all the same sports, it's difficult to count just certain sports. For instance, what makes men's gymnastics any less valid as women's gymnastics? Both genders compete in the Olympics; so, if they did away with men's, they might as well get rid of women's, too. And that would definitely hurt SEC schools' numbers. Recently, the standard has changed to only include the Top 20 sports, the Top 10 men's and the Top 10 women's. So, the fact that Stanford fields 31 varsity teams will be irrelevant... only the Top 10 men's and women's sports will be included.
Also, if it's a ranking of the school's athletic department, the size of the department and the number of sports offered should be considered, imo. Either way, there are no points awarded for simply having lots of sports... the schools actually have to succeed, be ranked, etc. at the end of their season to get any points.
But, just as an example, Stanford has 31 varsity programs in its athletic department, and has finished #1 the last 14 years in a row. However, UF has never finished outside of the Top 10, even though we only field 20 varsity teams (it'll be 21 when lacrosse starts next year)... even when we were at a disadvantage with fewer teams in the athletic department than schools like Stanford and UCLA.
Any ranking that has minnesota 2nd is about as relevant as bama's mnc's...
They likely won't be anywhere near there when it's all said and done. What the updates do accomplish is give an ongoing idea of who might win the SEC All Sports Trophy; because it's awarded in much the same way.