PDA

View Full Version : My General Football Rant


iacolb12
09-09-2007, 10:45 AM
As I look at the games played over the last two weeks, especially this week, it just proves my theory that the polls should remain where they were at the end of the previous season. Yeah, I don't care about the arguments that Team A lost six guys to graduation and the NFL. I don't care that Team A only got one bluechip commitment.

Why? Michigan, Notre Dame and Louisville are good reasons. (There are others.) It's the old "Your the champ till proven otherwise." I never thought any of these teams deserved their preseason ranking. Had no idea how bad Michigan was though. Yikes. Why add a guessing game to the polling and just sort it out as things go. Fine if Team A was number three last year. If they lose their first two the polls sort themselves out.

Next.
Louisville - Man, how I wanted them to lose. They are barely a top 20 team in my view and the pretty much proved it. It takes more than a whammo passing game. See Hawaii.

LSU – This is how I expected the Tigers to play all of last year. Well, actually, I expected them to be very good. They play like an NFL team right now. What's scary is LSU is still making those silly overthrows, semi-fumbles and mistakes that kill other teams and no one remembers them because of the way they play the rest of the game. I hope USC and LSU play up to their hype that'd make a heck of a champ game.

Georgia/SC – I kept my mouth shut this year as I predicted they were overrated last year and SC would win. I felt the same this year. But the game yesterday wasn't the game I expected. I don't know. Thought there would be more balance not just good D and sloppy O. Is it just me, or is Georgia better off playing as the under-dog and coming up the ranks.

Auburn – Ugh. I didn't expect Auburn to be a top five team, but I wasn't expecting this. Is this a Tommy Tuberville team? This is two years in a row they come out playing like it's a sandlot game.

My point in all of this is it just seems a lot of teams are playing sloppy. Especially SEC teams. I was looking forward to having LSU, Florida, South Carolina, maybe Georgia or Auburn in the top 15 at the end. Really. Now I'm not sure. (Believe me I would be delighted to include Arkansas, but I like my pessimist approach. That way I'm pleasantly surprised. ;) )

Am I the only one who feels this way?

Kevhugh
09-09-2007, 11:18 AM
I think our chances of having several teams ranked high or slim to none at this point. The teams not named LSU are all so evenly matched that anyone can win each Saturday. I can see a scenario where UF beats UT but loses to LSU, and either USC or UGA. UT loses to UF and say Kentucky but beats UGA and USC. USC beats UGA and Florida but loses to UT and UK. And that's just talking about the East teams. I think the parity in the conference will hurt our rankings but we will come out with LSU ranked highly and maybe one other west team. (Either Arkansas or Alabama at this point). After that I think we'll have several teams in the bottom 10-25 slots of the polls.

Gamecocks4Ever
09-09-2007, 11:26 AM
I think LSU will finish #1 if they dominate the conference as I think they could. Even if they slip and lose once, they're easily top 5. Other than that, I think Florida or the Ala/Ark winner is the only chance of the SEC having another top 10 team in the end. I do agree they'll have 3-5 in the bottom 15 spots of the poll.

iacolb12
09-10-2007, 03:17 PM
FYI: I was referring to Southern Cal when I said USC. Didn't know how it read. ;)

I would think Florida will linger in the top eight all year. Considering the recruiting classes they had the last two years they shouldn't slow at all.

SC just has to be consistent. As much as I hate Spurrier that d*mn offensive system just flat works. All you gotta do is play some D and not commit stupid turnovers.

I thought the East was stacked with it being Florida, Georgia, SC and maybe Tennessee. I only made that assessment because I predicted SC to whip Georgia last year and wasn't gonna stick my foot in my mouth again. lol.

So SC beat Georgia and I can't say I think Tennessee improved any. So why not Florida or SC?

As far as the "rest of the west", I don't know that I think anyone else would crack the top ten. The best I see Arkansas finishing is 10-1. Thats if we play better than I expect. 8-3 is probably the realistic bet. Yet I think they'll still finish second. Bama may prove me wrong, but I can't bet on Saban yet. And no one else seems to want it.

AUFootball24
09-10-2007, 03:21 PM
I don't agree at all that polls should carry over from year to year. Teams change, players graduate, freshman join the team. Different teams, same rankings.

What's the logic in that? Might as well do a hat pick for the polls. I believe polls shouldn't exist at all until at least week 3, probably later, as it's 99% speculation before that.

The Ramp
09-10-2007, 03:22 PM
what's a semi-fumble? is that where you fumble and recover it yourself?

we haven't done that yet

*knocks on wood*

GamecockDieHard
09-10-2007, 03:40 PM
FYI: I was referring to Southern Cal when I said USC. Didn't know how it read. ;)

I would think Florida will linger in the top eight all year. Considering the recruiting classes they had the last two years they shouldn't slow at all.

SC just has to be consistent. As much as I hate Spurrier that d*mn offensive system just flat works. All you gotta do is play some D and not commit stupid turnovers.

I thought the East was stacked with it being Florida, Georgia, SC and maybe Tennessee. I only made that assessment because I predicted SC to whip Georgia last year and wasn't gonna stick my foot in my mouth again. lol.

So SC beat Georgia and I can't say I think Tennessee improved any. So why not Florida or SC?

As far as the "rest of the west", I don't know that I think anyone else would crack the top ten. The best I see Arkansas finishing is 10-1. Thats if we play better than I expect. 8-3 is probably the realistic bet. Yet I think they'll still finish second. Bama may prove me wrong, but I can't bet on Saban yet. And no one else seems to want it.


I don't think either of those first 2 Gamecock posters thought for a second you were implying South Carolina and LSU would be in the championship game.

iacolb12
09-11-2007, 08:29 AM
what's a semi-fumble? is that where you fumble and recover it yourself? ....we haven't done that yet... *knocks on wood*

I was referring to a couple of barely forward screen passes. One was dropped right as the defender got there. The other was bobbled and dropped. Those are the things that make mortal teams cringe. :laugh:

I don't think either of those first 2 Gamecock posters thought for a second you were implying South Carolina and LSU would be in the championship game

Well I wanted to make sure people were not thinking I just meant the SEC instead of the NCAA championship. :blush:

AUFootball24. I could go with the no rankings till week 3 as well. I'm just saying giving teams rankings they don't deserve, and without proof, mucks up the whole mess. It would be less a mess to either leave the polls as they were or as you mention no poll.

The Ramp
09-11-2007, 09:29 AM
I was referring to a couple of barely forward screen passes. One was dropped right as the defender got there. The other was bobbled and dropped. Those are the things that make mortal teams cringe. :laugh:





i have no recollection of either of these plays. what game was that?