Top Cheaters

[GamecockDieHard]

Only OU? Not quite -- Sooners have lots of scandalous company - CBS SportsLine.com (http://www.sportsline.com/columns/story/10255471)

Not very complimentary of the SEC, with a couple of our brethren in the top 10...Auburn and Alabama. But interestingly, no mention of SoCal.

[bbqit]

wow! smu only number five with the death penalty. ole miss didn't even make the list with the penalty just shy of smu.

[GamecockDieHard]

Yeah, but the disturbing part is how Auburn and Alabama are ranked number 2 and number 1, respectfully. I haven't heard anything about those programs (recently) that makes them deserve that ranking. Typical anti-SEC bias?? To me, cLIMPson should've been in there with Danny (punk) Ford.

[SavageOrangeJug]

1. Alabama. This is all you need to know about the skill and greatness of Alabama. An NCAA committee found that booster forked over $150,000 to a high school coach as a guarantee that a defensive lineman would attend Alabama. Yes -- $150,000. Now that is how you break the rules, people. :whistle: Not saying a word.

[GamecockDieHard]

:whistle: Not saying a word.

Yeah, but was that in the last 5 years?

[azamugg]

and it wasnt Alabama that gave/promised the boy money either

[AUChamps]

http://www.sectalk.com/boards/sec-football-talk/18672-top-10-cheaters-college-football.html

[GamecockDieHard]

If you read the SoCal comments, they keep saying that it wasn't the boosters that gave Bush the money. However, if you read the article, it busts schools for not "monitoring" their players and what they received. Also, the agent that gave Bush all that stuff was actually a SoCal booster. He was an agent, but he's also a SoCal donor, from what I've heard.

[GamecockDieHard]

Sorry about that AUChamps. I looked before I started this thread and didn't see it.