View Full Version : Who is your 06-07 National Champions?
Foxman
04-19-2006, 10:49 PM
Be honest here. There are alot of teams that could make it so, sorry if I left acouple teams out. And if you pick other, please specify here.
(edit: just remembered I left out West Virginia, damn it!!! Lol, sorry. Mods, is it possible to replace Clemson with West Virginia for me?)
UA2008
04-19-2006, 11:58 PM
I think LSU will take it all this year. I also think Auburn has a great chance to do it too. Both LSU and Auburn are going to be pretty sick this year. I see a good battle in the west.
DELTOR
04-20-2006, 12:13 AM
I vote Clemson, cause I think that's absolutely hilarious that it was even a choice!!!! LOL!
SPURED
04-20-2006, 12:38 AM
i think Ohio St. has a pretty good chance. so i voted for them
Volnooga
04-20-2006, 07:46 AM
I didn't vote... I have absolutley no idea...
hmsdawgs
04-20-2006, 08:44 AM
I voted Oklahoma. I think they have a great year and surprise a lot of people.
I do not think that the Champ will come out of the SEC. While some of the top programs in the East...UGA, UT...and to an extent even UF (still developing the spread option with a pocket QB) are in a rebuilding mode or recovery mode its going to be very difficult to run the table. And while I think the West is better this year...its going to be very difficult for a team to go undefeated.
I think Okla. comes out of the shadows, adrian peterson will be better than ever and they will get their QB to perform.
GatorNation
04-20-2006, 02:04 PM
I voted Oklahoma. I think they have a great year and surprise a lot of people.
I watched OU's spring game, and I wasn't very impressed. Pedersen looks OK, but I wouldn't be surprised if he got hurt again. I also think Texass takes the bigxii south again in a tougher battle in this year's RRS.
I also agree that the national champ doesn't comes out of the SEC. It's just too difficult to get out of this conference without a few bumps and some help.
As for who will win the whole thing, I haven't done enough research to give a fact-based, objective opinion. A number of teams are contenders this year...but if I had to pick a few, I'd have to go with Notre Dame (one misstep against MSU cost them last year....and they should've beaten the Trojans), USC (too much great recruiting to have enough missing pieces that will hurt them), and OSU (building on a tough, impressive bowl win in a Big 10 that is theirs for the taking) as the early favs.
autiger1126
04-20-2006, 04:28 PM
USC loses a lot of talent (has people to replace them, but are young and will probably lose a game or two because of inexperience), OSU loses their entire defense, AU and LSU will probably lose a game a piece, ND has a tough schedule, Louisville and WV have too easy a schedule, UF has a tough schedule and won't go unscaithed (sp?), Clemson, uhh gimme a break, they lost Whitehurst an while they have great talent at RB, i don't think their defense will hold up, Texas lost VY and I don't see why everyone likes them so much (he was like 99% of their offense) and they lost a couple of good guys on D.
So that leaves Oklahoma. They were young last year, and ended strong. Bomar, if he isn't in jail, should be improved, and they have AD at running back. They had a strong D last year. If they get past Oregon in their opening game, then the only tough game they have left is with Texas, plus the Big XII championship game is a joke.
GatorNation
04-20-2006, 05:18 PM
USC loses a lot of talent (has people to replace them, but are young and will probably lose a game or two because of inexperience)...
>> Well, we thought that about Palmer leaving the job to Leinhart, and he did a pretty good job. Don't sleep on Saraksian (sp?). He's the real deal, and Booty or Sanchez will be ready to step into the roll. <<
OSU loses their entire defense...
>> Again, they've recuited well, and the Big 10 may come down to Meeechigan with Tate gone at Iowa. <<
AU and LSU will probably lose a game a piece...
>> Probably. <<
ND has a tough schedule...
>> But they did last year as well. USC will be a shade lower with the new QB--but still the class of the Pac-10--so, they won't be quite as tough as they were when ND came so close, and they get UM at home. UT will also probably still be getting their legs back. Also, I think I'm sold on Quinn as the frontrunner for the '06-'07 Heisman. He looked great last year, and in year #2 with Weiss, he'll probably look even better. :brick: <<
Louisville and WV have too easy a schedule...
>> True, but don't they always lose one they shouldn't? Last year, WV's only loss came from VT, but that was the exception, not the norm (see Pitt '04, Cincy '03, UWM '02, ND and Temple '01, etc.). But if they play like they did last year, they definitely have a shot....but they won't be flying under the radar this year. Teams won't make the same mistake jaw-juh made in the Sugar Bowl. <<
UF has a tough schedule and won't go unscaithed (sp?), Clemson, uhh gimme a break, they lost Whitehurst an while they have great talent at RB, i don't think their defense will hold up....
>> I agree on both counts. Our schedule rotation came at the the worst possible time for Leak's senior season. <<
Texas lost VY and I don't see why everyone likes them so much (he was like 99% of their offense) and they lost a couple of good guys on D.
>> Two words: Mack Brown. They've been getting the best players out of one of the best states in the entire nation for years. That program is loaded. Yes, Young is gone, but there shouldn't be much of a drop off in the weak bigxii. They should be full speed by the time the RRS rolls around and beyond. <<
So that leaves Oklahoma. They were young last year, and ended strong. Bomar, if he isn't in jail, should be improved, and they have AD at running back. They had a strong D last year. If they get past Oregon in their opening game, then the only tough game they have left is with Texas, plus the Big XII championship game is a joke.
>> Very true. I just think AP won't be the freshman he was two years ago. Bomar is better, but I'm not buying the defense just yet. They have do have a legit shot, though.... <<
WDavE
04-20-2006, 06:02 PM
Don't foget that the new USC quarterback won't have Chow to lead him towards the llight...
Leinhart was senior who still had a grasp on what Chow wanted to do.
geechee
04-20-2006, 06:54 PM
I totally agree with GN that it will be tough for any SEC team to get to the title game because of the parity in our conference. I disagree somwhat on the toughness of ND's schedule this year. It looks to me to be no tougher than the average SEC schedule. Sure there is Penn St, USC, and Michigan however before they get to the USC game there is also a 4 week stretch in which they play Navy, North Carolina, Air Force, and Army. Though I refuse to cast a vote in a poll in April, looking at the schedules I agree with GN that ND has as good a chance as anyone.
scfan5338
04-20-2006, 07:11 PM
we all know you can't win without a QB in college football, and last time I checked however if Clemson's QB is going to be a first-year starter. yea he is a senior but does he know the offense that well? Clemson has changed their offensive coordinators like 4 times in last 4 seasons. This guy has talent and he will do well but I dont think they are contendors for the national title by any means. Maybe in 07-08 and 08-09 when the have the Korn kid will they be contendors.
1000x
04-20-2006, 08:40 PM
As a dark horse candidate, I'd choose the Florida State Seminoles. Florida State will once again have a powerful defense and all the offense needs to do is not turn the ball over. Many of the Seminoles' toughest games are at home and the road games are not difficult at all except for Miami. Even if they were to lose to Miami in the opener, it should not hurt them much since the loss would be early. The Noles must find a running game, however.
As for teams that are on the list, I'd say Ohio State would stand the best chance. They lose a lot on defense, but have a lot of playmakers on offense. Also, Notre Dame has a shot, as they could be the nation's #1 offense. In the SEC, I would say Auburn would be the best bet running alongside Kenny Irons. Auburn pretty much loses everybody who ever caught a pass for them in 2005, though.
geechee
04-20-2006, 08:45 PM
I actually just looked at the poll for the first time. I'm not sure how any poll like this could include Louisville and Clemson but not include West Virginia.
Foxman
04-20-2006, 08:53 PM
I actually just looked at the poll for the first time. I'm not sure how any poll like this could include Louisville and Clemson but not include West Virginia.
Ya, my bad. I was going off the top of my head, I guess i forgot to think of the Big East.
geechee
04-20-2006, 08:59 PM
Ya, my bad. I was going off the top of my head, I guess i forgot to think of the Big East.
Well, I can understand that, everyone else has forgotten about the Big Least also:laugh:
BAMA NATE
04-20-2006, 09:14 PM
I had to go with Ohio State. They have way too much fire-power to be stopped by anyone in my opinion. All they have to do is some patch-work on Defense and it will be theirs for the taking.
Why are Florida, Auburn, and LSU even in this category? I know we have some homers but this ain't gonna be an SEC year guys!! Maybe next year but we ain't got nobody that can run the table. LSU has the best chance, Auburn will drop two, and Florida...please!!! :dry:
blues_cap
04-20-2006, 09:27 PM
I had to go with Ohio State. They have way too much fire-power to be stopped by anyone in my opinion. All they have to do is some patch-work on Defense and it will be theirs for the taking.
Why are Florida, Auburn, and LSU even in this category? I know we have some homers but this ain't gonna be an SEC year guys!! Maybe next year but we ain't got nobody that can run the table. LSU has the best chance, Auburn will drop two, and Florida...please!!! :dry:
yeah, where is alabama. they have won 12 national championships and won the cotton bowl just last year. to top that off, they beat florida bad. did i mention they have won 12 national championships? even though alabama lost their whole defense they should be considered. did i mention they had 12 national championships and bear bryant used to coach there???
geechee
04-20-2006, 09:34 PM
Yea, you very well could be right Nate. If, they can pull out a win at Texas in the second week, they could be looking good. They still have to get through a tough Big 10 schedule but the real biggies are home games for them. They have to play at Mich St which is always good for a big upset or two no matter what kind of team they have but, they have Penn St, Mich,and Minn at home and miss Wisconsin this year. They also don't have to worry about playing in a conference title game so it would be hard for anyone to argue with your pick here, at this point at least.
BAMA NATE
04-20-2006, 09:35 PM
yeah, where is alabama. they have won 12 national championships and won the cotton bowl just last year. to top that off, they beat florida bad. did i mention they have won 12 national championships? even though alabama lost their whole defense they should be considered. did i mention they had 12 national championships and bear bryant used to coach there???
I've not so much as considered Bama winning any kind of a championship this season for your information although it could be done on the Conference level anyway. LSU has some chance of running the table but if you think Florida is going to then...its your business. My point was that we shouldn't expect SEC dominance just yet.
BAMA NATE
04-20-2006, 09:41 PM
Yea, you very well could be right Nate. If, they can pull out a win at Texas in the second week, they could be looking good. They still have to get through a tough Big 10 schedule but the real biggies are home games for them. They have to play at Mich St which is always good for a big upset or two no matter what kind of team they have but, they have Penn St, Mich,and Minn at home and miss Wisconsin this year. They also don't have to worry about playing in a conference title game so it would be hard for anyone to argue with your pick here, at this point at least.
I'm thinking it might be one of those years where you have a couple of once-beaten teams going for it all. It has been done and not too long ago actually. It might pan out that way but if that happens then Ohio St. could be in trouble if they lose to Texas because that is another team that could make some serious BCS noise.
GatorHunter
04-21-2006, 10:20 AM
LSU has the best chance, Auburn will drop two, and Florida...please!!!
I agree...it will be very difficult for "any" SEC team this year to run the table...however, with what UF has coming back, I think the Gators have as good a chance as anyone else in the SEC to have a special season...granted, running the table, esp. with UF having OOC games the likes of South Miss and @ f$u will be a stretch...to say the least.
autiger1126
04-21-2006, 03:26 PM
I think that if anyone is going to run the table in the SEC it would be Auburn. We've got a cake schedule that sets up our big games nicely. Not to mention we get LSU, UF, and UGA at home. We get MSU, USC, OM, and UAT on the road. Our toughest game on the road is at Alabama and we've done pretty well against them as of late. LSU has to go to Ark., UF, UT, and AU. UF has to go to UT, AU, and FSU, not to mention they have to play Alabama, LSU, Auburn, and Georgia in consecutive weeks minus a bye before UGA.
DELTOR
04-21-2006, 03:54 PM
Everyone's schedule in the SEC this year looks so brutal :blackeye:
GatorNation
04-22-2006, 09:26 AM
As a dark horse candidate, I'd choose the Florida State Seminoles. Florida State will once again have a powerful defense and all the offense needs to do is not turn the ball over. Many of the Seminoles' toughest games are at home and the road games are not difficult at all except for Miami. Even if they were to lose to Miami in the opener, it should not hurt them much since the loss would be early. The Noles must find a running game, however.
Free-shoes? They lose Bunkley, Sims, Cromartie, A. J. Nicholson, Leon Washington, Watkins, Wimbley, and a bunch of others.
I'm not buying f$u as a title contender right now.
TigerHeel
04-23-2006, 06:48 PM
I agree...it will be very difficult for "any" SEC team this year to run the table...however, with what UF has coming back, I think the Gators have as good a chance as anyone else in the SEC to have a special season...granted, running the table, esp. with UF having OOC games the likes of South Miss and @ f$u will be a stretch...to say the least.
I won't go so far as to say Florida won't win it, or can't win it. I just don't think that they will.
Y'all did damn well last season. Much better than I ever thought you would. I say that because, as good a QB as Chris Leak is, he is not the QB to run that offense. It goes right against his weaknesses. He is a decent runner, but, not the calibre you want for the spread. Plus, with a whole season seeing it, SEC DCs will have a much better idea of how to defend it. He will take some more shots this year than last.
If he survives the regular season unscathed, then you all will have a great chance then. But, again, I don't see Florida going into Auburn and winning, either.
;)
As for my picks, I'll say its LSU-OSU for the BCS title game. That could change, but, thats my call here in April.
GatorHunter
04-23-2006, 09:46 PM
I won't go so far as to say Florida won't win it, or can't win it. I just don't think that they will.
Y'all did damn well last season. Much better than I ever thought you would. I say that because, as good a QB as Chris Leak is, he is not the QB to run that offense. It goes right against his weaknesses. He is a decent runner, but, not the calibre you want for the spread. Plus, with a whole season seeing it, SEC DCs will have a much better idea of how to defend it. He will take some more shots this year than last.
If he survives the regular season unscathed, then you all will have a great chance then. But, again, I don't see Florida going into Auburn and winning, either.
;)
As for my picks, I'll say its LSU-OSU for the BCS title game. That could change, but, thats my call here in April.
Don't get me wrong, Tiger. I'm not predicting a Fiesta Bowl game for UF...I just think we have a pretty good team coming back...we are still gonna suffer with depth problems at DB and LB, and if we have any injuries at either...our goose could be cooked. Your right about Leak...he's just not the right QB...and he's really not a good runner...he hates to be hit...I think the offense will be more effective this year, though. SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it...and forget about 2007 with Tebow as a starter.
But looking at the other SEC teams, I would say that Auburn and LSU, both, have excellent chances as well...both teams did lose some great D players, though. I don't think LSU will be able to come into the Swamp and beat us...nor will Bama...UGA in the WLOCP will be tough...but I think UF wins that one as well. Believe it or not, I think our two toughest games, besides f$u in tallahassee, will be UT and Auburn. It's gonna be tough to go into Auburn and beat the Tigers....and we'll be UT's first test for next year, playing them in K'ville. I will be very happy with a 10-2 record at years end....very happy.
geechee
04-23-2006, 11:11 PM
SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it...
Yea, every single other SEC school but UF went out and hired the biggest idiots they could find to be defensive coordinators. :laugh:
Y'all will never cease to amaze me with y'all's arrogance, never!
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 12:24 AM
Yea, every single other SEC school but UF went out and hired the biggest idiots they could find to be defensive coordinators. :laugh:
Y'all will never cease to amaze me with y'all's arrogance, never!
You've got a real big Orange & Blue Chip on your shoulder, huh geechee... :wacko:
There was no arrogance in my statement...the offense was a work in progress last season...it pretty much changed game by game, so my point was...I'll spell it out for you...I know it's hard for you to grasp...that DC couldn't "figure out" UF's scheme because UF didn't even have it figured out.
See...this is a typical "geechee response"...callin' someone out when there's no need to...he turns on the heat, then cries :crying: when it gets to hot.... :whistle:
geechee
04-24-2006, 01:47 AM
You've got a real big Orange & Blue Chip on your shoulder, huh geechee... :wacko:
There was no arrogance in my statement...the offense was a work in progress last season...it pretty much changed game by game, so my point was...I'll spell it out for you...I know it's hard for you to grasp...that DC couldn't "figure out" UF's scheme because UF didn't even have it figured out.
See...this is a typical "geechee response"...callin' someone out when there's no need to...he turns on the heat, then cries :crying: when it gets to hot.... :whistle:
Don't try and change what you said by saying you will "spell it out for me". You said "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it."
You saying that NO defensive coordinator in the SEC will be able to figure out UF's offense this year is not arrogant? It is absolutely the most arrogant statement that has ever been posted on this site. I can't call you out on some BS statement without you whining about it? Please little boy, grow up. :laugh:
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 08:28 AM
Plus, with a whole season seeing it, SEC DCs will have a much better idea of how to defend it. He will take some more shots this year than last.
geechee...I was responding to this statement by Tiger...I said that the SEC DCs had only seen a "skeletonized" or "bare-bones" version of Meyer's offense. My point was, even UF fans have not seen this offense run with fluidity, so how in the heck can SEC DCs have a better idea of how to defend it...again, this offense has been "tinkered" with on a daily basis because of Leak's inability to effectively run it....once again, you're mistaken... :whistle:
You mistakenly interpret ignorance for arrogance....poor geechee.. :laugh:
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 08:34 AM
You saying that NO defensive coordinator in the SEC will be able to figure out UF's offense this year:
I didn't say that...I said that SEC DCs, like UF fans, have only seen "bits and pieces" of this offense...so how can they fully prepare for an offense that's yet to be played? Anyway, you took it the wrong way, man...as you usually do. :brick:
WDavE
04-24-2006, 08:46 AM
I hate to say it but Texas probably has the best shot...
They have a two game schedule this year. Oklahoma and Ohio St. If not the Long Horns then somebody (Louisville or West Virginia) in the Big Least.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 09:44 AM
I hate to say it but Texas probably has the best shot...
They have a two game schedule this year. Oklahoma and Ohio St. If not the Long Horns then somebody (Louisville or West Virginia) in the Big Least.
I agree...the WVU schedule is a complete joke! As far as Texas...at least they play two teams with BCS asprirations...some of the other "prominant" teams across the country don't come close.
geechee
04-24-2006, 03:15 PM
I didn't say that...I said that SEC DCs, like UF fans, have only seen "bits and pieces" of this offense...so how can they fully prepare for an offense that's yet to be played? Anyway, you took it the wrong way, man...as you usually do. :brick:
They prepare by preparing, fool. They had never been to the moon before either so how could they possibly prepare for that? They have studied football all their lives whereas you have not even spent five minutes studying it so you could never understand.
These are your exact words. "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it." I know you say, that you did not say that but, you did, so you are not only arrogant and ignorant but once again you are lying.
This started off as a thread about who people thought might have the best chance to win the national championship. As usual since you know nothing about football you once again turned it into a thread about UF. You do this to every single thread you post on, every single one. If someone points this out to you, you throw tantrums little baby boy.
GatorNation
04-24-2006, 03:59 PM
Don't try and change what you said by saying you will "spell it out for me". You said "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it."
You saying that NO defensive coordinator in the SEC will be able to figure out UF's offense this year is not arrogant? It is absolutely the most arrogant statement that has ever been posted on this site. I can't call you out on some BS statement without you whining about it? Please little boy, grow up. :laugh:
C'mon, Gee, that's not what was said. Everyone knows we're not running the spread option offense yet, and we only ran a few glimpses of it earlier in the season. So, when people talk about "defending the spread option offense," there is no "defense" of the system, because Florida isn't running it at this point. That was Hunter's only point. And that is not the same thing as saying DCs won't be able to defend it (when we run it), and I think that iassumption is what's bothering you. But, honestly, I didn't get that from his post.
I'll assume we can all move on now.....back to topic?
NC contenders.....
geechee
04-24-2006, 04:18 PM
C'mon, Gee, that's not what was said. Everyone knows we're not running the spread option offense yet, and we only ran a few glimpses of it earlier in the season. So, when people talk about "defending the spread option offense," there is no "defense" of the system, because Florida isn't running it at this point. That was Hunter's only point. And that is not the same thing as saying DCs won't be able to defend it (when we run it), and I think that iassumption is what's bothering you. But, honestly, I didn't get that from his post.
I'll assume we can all move on now.....back to topic?
NC contenders.....
That is exactly what he said. It is in black and white. "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it." He can say it was not what he said and you can say whatever to simply back him up as usual but that is exactly what he said. He certainly did not come close to saying what you now say he said. GN, we can certainly move on but, you know gatorhunter always has the last word so he will be the one that won't let us move on unless he suddenly has some awakening.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 05:26 PM
They prepare by preparing, fool. They had never been to the moon before either so how could they possibly prepare for that? They have studied football all their lives whereas you have not even spent five minutes studying it so you could never understand.
These are your exact words. "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it." I know you say, that you did not say that but, you did, so you are not only arrogant and ignorant but once again you are lying.
This started off as a thread about who people thought might have the best chance to win the national championship. As usual since you know nothing about football you once again turned it into a thread about UF. You do this to every single thread you post on, every single one. If someone points this out to you, you throw tantrums little baby boy.
Do you have any formal education? I ask because you obviously have a "skewed" reading comprehension issue. GN understood my post...as I'm sure most other posters on the board did...you are obviously not "smart" enough to understand...I'm sorry geechee, I'm not a English teacher...so someone else will have to walk you through it... :whistle:
BTW, I played football for 13 years from "pee-wee" through-out HS...starting LB and RB on a state championship team in 1988...go check the Florida HS state champs...Graceville 1988 State Champs....I'll try and scan my ring for my avatar....again, wrong as usual geechee.... :laugh:
geechee
04-24-2006, 05:43 PM
As I told GN, there was no way you could just let this drop. You spoke the words not me. I simply called you out on them. Instead of originally saying that maybe you misspoke, you just started attacking me as usual for calling you out on your own statement. Your whole little deal is just to keep attacking me until GN throws me out of here but alas, that is my goal also. I have said nothing that was not true with you but, that will not matter will it? I want it to happen to prove a point because, I have done nothing wrong but disagree with a gators' fan. I love your little cartoon friends little boy. I'm glad they are here for people like you to use since you can not use actual words without tripping over them.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 05:47 PM
As I told GN, there was no way you could just let this drop. You spoke the words not me. I simply called you out on them. Instead of originally saying that maybe you misspoke you just started attacking me as usual for calling you out on your own statement. Your whole little deal is just to keep attacking me until GN throws me out of here but alas, that is my goal also. I have said nothing that was not true with you but that will not matter will it. I want it to happen to prove a point. I love your little cartoon friends little boy. I'm glad they are here for people like you to use since you can not use actual words without tripping over them.
As I said, get someone to help you understand my original post....OK
You attacked me...as usual, and I put you in your place...as usual... :whistle:
geechee
04-24-2006, 05:56 PM
This is what you said "SEC DC didn't really see but a "skeletonized" version of it last year, so, they really will not know how to defend it." What don't I understand? As far as you putting me in my place, you could never reach that high.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 06:17 PM
you could never reach that high.
I will not argue that point...you are definitely high... :ohmy:
That is exactly what I said, however, in your infinite "lack of" wisdom, you took it as an arrogant statement...it was exactly the opposite.
roosterj37
04-24-2006, 06:21 PM
So was that a skeletonized version of the spread that yall tried to run agianst Bama.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 06:29 PM
So was that a skeletonized version of the spread that yall tried to run agianst Bama.
Yea...with osteoporosis :blackeye:
autiger1126
04-24-2006, 06:38 PM
This is dumb, you obviously didn't run the entire playbook, and you probably didn't run it perfectly. Welcome to everyones offense. Al Borges is gonna put in more plays into the system, so watch out everyone. The basic system didn't work for the gators to the effectiveness it did for Utah. Yes, I expect it to get better, but will it be unstoppable? No. The SEC defenses are too good for that. So quit hyping up the offensive genius of urban meyer only to let yourself down come the big games, where people play defense.
geechee
04-24-2006, 07:04 PM
I will not argue that point...you are definitely high... :ohmy:
That is exactly what I said, however, in your infinite "lack of" wisdom, you took it as an arrogant statement...it was exactly the opposite.
You owe me an apology bub. Every single post you make about me, you say that I am calling you names and hoping nobody will scroll up. You telling me I'm high just because I disagree and you can not defend your position shows how low of a person you are. You are a total lowlife bub. Great, you can say anything you want about anyone in here because you are a gator and nothing will happen to you but everyone reads the nonsense you type and knows that you know nothing about NCAA football. You have to use lil cartoon characters to make your points and to attack people. I understand that you are still just a teenager but you are in here with big boys so why not act like it?
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 08:17 PM
You owe me an apology bub. Every single post you make about me, you say that I am calling you names and hoping nobody will scroll up. You telling me I'm high just because I disagree and you can not defend your position shows how low of a person you are. You are a total lowlife bub. Great, you can say anything you want about anyone in here because you are a gator and nothing will happen to you but everyone reads the nonsense you type and knows that you know nothing about NCAA football. You have to use lil cartoon characters to make your points and to attack people. I understand that you are still just a teenager but you are in here with big boys so why not act like it?
Man, really...it's hilarious to watch you play "victim"....but everybody on this board knows that you are an instigator...you misread my post and tried to call me out on it...and it didn't work. The only time that I've posted "negatively" towards you is when you provoke me...i.e., calling me a "fool"....get over it. An adult would have posted something similar to Tiger's last post...he also seems to take your perspective about my post, only he offers reason for his perspective...not insults.
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 08:35 PM
This is dumb, you obviously didn't run the entire playbook, and you probably didn't run it perfectly. Welcome to everyones offense. Al Borges is gonna put in more plays into the system, so watch out everyone. The basic system didn't work for the gators to the effectiveness it did for Utah. Yes, I expect it to get better, but will it be unstoppable? No. The SEC defenses are too good for that. So quit hyping up the offensive genius of urban meyer only to let yourself down come the big games, where people play defense.
I was responding to this statement made by TigerHeel...."Plus, with a whole season seeing it, SEC DCs will have a much better idea of how to defend it. He will take some more shots this year than last." And "hyping" the offense was the last thing on my mind when I posted...
My point was, SEC DCs didn't see the offense for a full season...no one did...I never said it would be unstoppable, only that SEC DCs had little to go on...TigerHeel insinuated that SEC DC had "figured out" the system and Leak would take more shots...thing is, UF never developed the system, Leak was having trouble with reads and running so the offense was "tailored" for him. Hopefully, another Spring and Summer of practicing will pay dividends for his success...who knows... :scratch_h
geechee
04-24-2006, 11:14 PM
Man, really...it's hilarious to watch you play "victim"....but everybody on this board knows that you are an instigator...you misread my post and tried to call me out on it...and it didn't work. The only time that I've posted "negatively" towards you is when you provoke me...i.e., calling me a "fool"....get over it. An adult would have posted something similar to Tiger's last post...he also seems to take your perspective about my post, only he offers reason for his perspective...not insults.
I don't play victim. I'm nobody's victim. I called you out and it did work. You refer to calling out as provoking because in your very small mind, nobody is supposed to challenge a gator's BS. Point to any other single person that I have had a problem with besides a few of you lil gators. You can't. Now I have been made to understand that everyone in here just passes over your posts without reading them because they are so silly. This way they just avoid the problems. I guess I just need to learn to rise above it and do the same as the rest which is just pass right by the post when I see your name, either that or accept your posts as pure comedy.....................aloha
GatorHunter
04-24-2006, 11:54 PM
I don't play victim. I'm nobody's victim. I called you out and it did work. You refer to calling out as provoking because in your very small mind, nobody is supposed to challenge a gator's BS. Point to any other single person that I have had a problem with besides a few of you lil gators. You can't. Now I have been made to understand that everyone in here just passes over your posts without reading them because they are so silly. This way they just avoid the problems. I guess I just need to learn to rise above it and do the same as the rest which is just pass right by the post when I see your name, either that or accept your posts as pure comedy.....................aloha
Actually, it didn't work...when you call someone out, you have to either prove them wrong or prove a point...you've done neither...sorry geechee.
As I've said before, I've received several PMs from other posters about your "antics"....only a couple were Gators....when you want to have an adult discussion, I'll be happy to match wits with you. Have a good night.
DELTOR
04-25-2006, 11:50 AM
Go Cocks!!!!!
azamugg
04-25-2006, 03:48 PM
Geechee...........will you shut the hell up and go eat a sammich :smile: you know what I think you need....uh huh, so go knock it out bro
geechee
04-25-2006, 04:00 PM
Geechee...........will you shut the hell up and go eat a sammich :smile: you know what I think you need....uh huh, so go knock it out bro
aza, I already stated that I would not respond to any of his posts anymore and I can't knock it out because she is back in Brazil visiting her family :laugh:
AUTiger94
04-25-2006, 06:18 PM
Geechee...........will you shut the hell up and go eat a sammich :smile: you know what I think you need....uh huh, so go knock it out bro
Spam and Reese's sandwiches! I hear that is what they like down in Paradise! :dry: :spam:
AUTiger94
04-25-2006, 06:20 PM
aza, I already stated that I would not respond to any of his posts anymore and I can't knock it out because she is back in Brazil visiting her family :laugh:
You better hope she's not hangin w/ the "Footvol" team down there in Brasil! :dry: :spam:
geechee
04-25-2006, 08:39 PM
You better hope she's not hangin w/ the "Footvol" team down there in Brasil! :dry: :spam:
:laugh: :laugh:
She still loves you for proving me to be an idiota, Tiger.
GatorNation
04-26-2006, 06:18 PM
Geechee...........will you shut the hell up and go eat a sammich :smile: you know what I think you need....uh huh, so go knock it out bro
OK, ok....gators and dawgs hate each other.
Can we get back to topic now?
:D
AFWarrior83
04-26-2006, 07:18 PM
I picked Barn, but out of the SEC I would say OSU Bucks.
DELTOR
04-26-2006, 08:27 PM
What does IMO mean?
autiger1126
04-26-2006, 08:35 PM
in my opinion
DELTOR
04-26-2006, 09:10 PM
thank you so much
UA2008
04-26-2006, 09:25 PM
Wow we just witnessed to teams getting off the topic and fighting with each other. And it didnt even involve Alabama or Auburn. That is a first.
autiger1126
04-27-2006, 12:31 AM
just to let you guys know, usc's qb phenom sanchez got arrested for sexual assault.
DELTOR
04-27-2006, 11:29 AM
LOL! That is sad and hilarious at the same time. More hilarious though. Is the school required to punish him for committing a a crime, or is it optional? If it were optional, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it goes unpunished (maybe a little slap on the wrist).
WDavE
04-27-2006, 12:26 PM
I say he comes off suspension two days before fall practice.......
Chivas
04-27-2006, 01:11 PM
USCarolina will win the next 10 National Championships, after which Steve Spurrier will retire.
GAMECOCK_FAN
04-27-2006, 01:20 PM
USCarolina will win the next 10 National Championships, after which Steve Spurrier will retire.
Now, finally, we have someone on here who knows college football. :thumpsup:
BamaMatt
04-27-2006, 04:20 PM
Retired because the badmitton team is the only one winning NC's there? :whistle:
DELTOR
04-27-2006, 04:52 PM
Retired because the badmitton team is the only one winning NC's there? :whistle:
What? :headscrat
GatorNation
04-27-2006, 05:42 PM
just to let you guys know, usc's qb phenom sanchez got arrested for sexual assault.
Second time in, what...? One year?
I know someone else on the USC roster was almost charged....then left for Nevada, I think....
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.