PDA

View Full Version : Worst team in the SEC...


JerryBeeds
10-30-2005, 01:03 PM
Who is the worst team in the SEC this year?

Jordan
10-30-2005, 01:04 PM
After the loss to Kentucky this week, I'd have to say MSU. :)

RW13
10-30-2005, 01:42 PM
Ole Miss, MSU will beat them, UK could beat them, Vandy shouldn't be in the poll, Ark is sucking this year and UT isn't world beaters...

Jordan
10-30-2005, 01:50 PM
Ole Miss, MSU will beat them, UK could beat them, Vandy shouldn't be in the poll, Ark is sucking this year and UT isn't world beaters...
Arkansas' record isn't that great, but they've got a couple of talented backs and a good OL that can at least let them "hang" with some good teams. And believe me, living out here I'd much rather say that they suck, but I just don't believe they're THAT bad. Give the young guys another year or two, and they'll be a good team.

Ole Miss isn't horrible either, and I think they'll definitely beat MSU. I like Croom, but I'm still not sold on him as a college coach. Granted he didn't go into the best of situations at MSU, but I'm now beginning to get doubtful that he's the guy to build it up for them.

The worst teams of the league this year, are UK and MSU.... and that was settled on the field this week. :)

rabidcock
10-30-2005, 02:21 PM
The worst teams of the league this year, are UK and MSU.... and that was settled on the field this week. :)

Yeah, MSU gets my vote. And RW...please take care what you say; we have to play the Razors at their place next weekend, and they have hung with some good SEC teams. :eek:

Cianne
10-30-2005, 02:42 PM
Ole Miss...UK could beat them

Well obviously not because they didn't.

Djshockley3
10-30-2005, 03:32 PM
Miss st,after the loss to UK I have to say them.

TigerFanatic
10-30-2005, 04:29 PM
who the hell voted for Vandy? lol

GeauxTo
10-30-2005, 04:40 PM
Definitely the hapless dogs from Starkville... I've said that from the beginning.

:D

TidalFury18
10-30-2005, 07:11 PM
Below is my objective opinion of how the SEC should be ranked at this point. It could very well change within a week's time, and likely will.

(1) Alabama -- ...but, for how long? Given the lack of offensive production in recent weeks, a loss to LSU or Auburn could be in the not-so-distant future. Should Hall, Brown, Caddell, or Knight fill the void incurred through the loss of Prothro, we could very well be on our way to an SEC Title; possibly a national title. If not, a disappointing 9-2 season is highly possible.
(2) Georgia -- ...still second best, regardless of their loss to Florida. With Shockley, they would have likely beaten the Gators handily. Had that happened, it's possible that UGA would be #1 on this list.
(3) Auburn -- If not for Vaughn's misses against LSU, they'd be tied with us for first in the West. Until November 12.
(4) LSU -- Wasted potential. Enough said.
(5) Florida -- Even with a win against Georgia at the WLOCP, it must be taken into consideration that Shockley did not play. Had the 'Dawgs been healthy, it's almost a given that UGA would have emerged victorious from this battle of interstate rivals.
(6) South Carolina -- Under the guidance of my man Spurrier's genius, the Cocks will rise to the top of the East within a few short years. Mark it down.
(7) Tennessee -- Wasted potential. Part deux.
(8) Vanderbilt -- Prior to their loss to hapless Middle Tennessee, I would have testified to you that this was no ordinary Vandy team; however, more recently, they have proven to be just that. Even so, they do hold victories over Ole Miss and Arkansas. Hence the higher ranking.
(9) Arkansas -- With McFadden at RB, the Hogs will prove competitive in the West as quickly as next season.
(10) Ole Miss -- Excellent defense, horrific offense. Even so, FURMAN is more talented than the 'Cats and 'Dogs.
(11) Kentucky -- Luckily for UK fans, basketball season is juuuust around the corner. ;)
(12) Mississippi State -- What can be said of a team with inferior talent? Over a period of six years, MSU has gone from being moderately formidable to a thoughtless "W". It's quite sad.

1000x
10-30-2005, 08:46 PM
I'd have to go with Mississippi State. It's a shame because it seems as if Sylvester Croom is trying his absolute best but the results don't show. Like a lot of SEC teams, the problem is on offense. Croom has installed the West Coast offense, but it hasn't worked thus far. In general, the West Coast offense has lost its effect all around the football world. You may note how it has brought down Nebraska's once proud program and how it is ruining Michael Vick's career with the NFL's Atlanta Falcons. The same is happening at State, and Croom may have to scrap the West Coast offense and run something that better fits his personnel if MSU is to get out of the cellar. The Bulldogs have Omarr Conner and Mike Henig at quarterback, not Joe Montana or Brett Favre.

Kentucky has to be second on the list. Since Rich Brooks took over, the Kentucky offense--the one thing they could proud of in years past--has fallen to last in the conference, and that's really saying something in the SEC. At least they have a last-place defense to match. Much like Alabama, Kentucky is going through a probationary period in which the Wildcats have fewer scholarships. Kentucky has had a few good players like Jared Lorenzen, Derek Abney, Dewayne Robertson, Vincent Burns and Artose Pinner, but they need a few more.

Arkansas is not that bad of a team. They have plenty of future stars (and some current) and I expect them to get back into bowl contention next year. The same can't be said of Ole Miss. It's amazing how the departure of a only a few players (most notably Eli Manning) in 2003 has crippled an entire offense for two seasons under two different head coaches. Vanderbilt may go back to its losing ways after this year with the departure of Jay Cutler.