PDA

View Full Version : Vols Report Card-Post Florida Game


OrangeCrush
09-19-2005, 12:09 PM
Offense

Quarterbacks

Erik Ainge and Rick Clausan combined to go 16 of 34 for 147 yards with 1 TD. You do not win in hostile enviroments with this kind of production. Most people know that if you have two quarterbacks, you have none. It took the Florida game for the Vols coaching staff to realize this. The only thing saving this group from a failing grade is the touchdown drive in the second half that ended with a TD reception to Brett Smith. Grade D

Running Backs

15 carries for 81 yards in the first half. 6 carries for, wait a second, only 6 carries in the second half? The Vols running backs did a solid job in the first half. In the second half, they simply did not have a chance. A failing grade to Corey Anderson must be given as he wiffed on as many blocks as he did make. Riggs is a feature back who is not getting featured enough. Foster showed some things in his limited role. Grade B

Wide Receivers
The Flordia defense made adjustments in their package to put the ball in the QB's hands and make him, plus the receivers beat the Gators. We know how this one played out. To many times, the receivers and QB were not on the same page. This did not look like a group that had been hyped as one of the best units in the SEC. I'm not sure who is ultimatly to blame, but I'll get to that in a few seconds. The bottom line is that the receivers did not get the job done. Grade D


Offensive Playcalling
Tennessee abandon the run with the score still within an one score game. The screens on third and long will drive you nuts. The waste of timeouts, because the wrong players are on the field. The lack of pass routes over the middle. The ineptitude of a two QB system. Need I go on? The whole offensive staff was burned in this game. Nobody brom OC Randy Sanders to OLine coach Jimmy Ray Stephens should feel good about his game. Tennessee played like a freshman led group, when the starters are made up of mostly juniors and seniors. Grade F

Defense

Defensive Line

The defensive line was one of the bright spots for the Vols. The Gators rushed for 31 yards in the first quarter and 37 yards for the rest of the game. The DT's were sound in their assignment against the spread option. The DE's were able to bring some pressure to Chris Leak, while also playing sound football against the run. Grade A

Linebackers
The LB's did a good job overall in this game, but were exposed in the zone pass coverage. The tackling from this unit was above average, but there were some critical misses. When asked to blitz, the LB's showed off their speed. The dropped interception by Kevin Simon hurts. As did the lack of contain on the end around. They are not the best LB crew in the SEC, but they might challenge for that distinction by the end of the year. Grade B-

Defensive Backs

As was the Linebackers, the DB's were exposed in coverage. The group was put in a position to not give up the big play passing and they accomplished that. Again, a dropped interception by Antwan Stewart hurt the team. The Gators WR's did not run free all of the game and that is an improvement over last year. When Leak did have time to make his reads, there were more plays where receivers were open instead of tight coverage. The jury is still out on this group, because nobody is sure what will happen if the opposing team's blocking holds for a game and the defensive backs have to stick their coverage. Grade C


Defensive Playcalling

With the exception of the 3rd and forever plays that the Gators completed in the 2nd half, the defense was well called. Everybody knew that Chavis would come after Leak and he held true to form. It was a good enough mixture of Blitzs and coverage, that the offense of Florida ever got on track. Grade B+


Special Teams A blocked FG, A fake Punt on the wrong side of the 50 yard line, A dropped punt, and no return game in Kickoffs or Punt Return. Is Fulmer's kids in charge of the special teams, because that is the only way a coach should not be running steps after this performance. Grade F

jneesy
09-19-2005, 12:12 PM
ewww thats pretty rough

fernandomike
09-19-2005, 12:19 PM
Upgrade the defensive backs to a B, the rest is right on target. Special teams were a disaster and the offense was just as bad. Our offense is loaded with 4 and 5 star recruits. Either the recruiting rankings and our talent evaluations are miles off base or our game-planning is a joke. My gut tells me the later is the case.

GeauxTo
09-19-2005, 01:19 PM
Good, detailed analysis.

sainvol
09-19-2005, 04:23 PM
Your analysis is pretty right on, Orangekrush...Does anyone else blame Fulmer only for this loss? Doesn't it seem like Randy Sanders is fed up as well? Aren't we sure that Clausen has earned the starting job long ago? Just some personal thoughts...

GatorNation
09-19-2005, 06:28 PM
Your analysis is pretty right on, Orangekrush...Does anyone else blame Fulmer only for this loss? Doesn't it seem like Randy Sanders is fed up as well? Aren't we sure that Clausen has earned the starting job long ago? Just some personal thoughts...

Just a quick disclaimer: I think we should remember that UF's defense/schemes/coaches played a sizeable roll in helping to generate these grades...imo.

thethrill
09-19-2005, 06:51 PM
Just a quick disclaimer: I think we should remember that UF's defense/schemes/coaches played a sizeable roll in helping to generate these grades...imo.

I do agree UF's defense played tremendously well. UT usually wins in spite of their Off. Coor.(Sanders), but the Gators tackled well and prevented that from happening this time. The game was one of those hard-nosed SEC battles that usually favors UT. Both teams made mistakes, but UT made the ones you just can't make and win. It was a good win for Fla.

OrangeCrush
09-19-2005, 06:52 PM
Just a quick disclaimer: I think we should remember that UF's defense/schemes/coaches played a sizeable roll in helping to generate these grades...imo.

Should have known that a Gator would get in this thread and demand respect for his team. Isn't the victory enough? J/K by the way.

Tennessee stopped running the ball. The OC and possibly Fulmer outthought themselves. They saw man coverage on the outside and believed it was the way to beat the Gators. The only problem is that the QB position was not the strong point, needed to do so. The Gators also loaded the box up with 8 and sometimes 9 in the box. They dared UT to throw it. UT did and could not complete enough passes. The co Defensive coordiantors of the Gators deserve credit for adjusting. The Vols offensive braintrust never adjusted correctly.

Tennessee use to have an identity as a power running football team. It use to be about imposing their will on the opponent. While you do have to gameplan and adjust to what the defense gives you, your team has to have an identity and they need to stick to it. Tennessee was domintating the Florida defense by running the ball to the left side. Florida adjusted and added more men to the box. Tennessee did not even try to run the ball. The braintrust said, lets throw deep, because that is what they are giving us. Where is the identity of the Volunteers.

Tennessee was not able to sustain drives in the second half. Tennessee did not run the ball. The defense had to see more time on the field and wore down towards the end of the game. The special teams lost the game with their blunders. The offense did not do anything to help the team in the second half. The Vols coaching staff took the best offensive weapon(Riggs) and relegated him to a blocker or receiver. What is wrong with this picture?

thethrill
09-19-2005, 07:22 PM
I really do agree we gave up on the run too early, but you have to have some kind of passing threat or you're just running into a brick wall. I think the major mistake was trying to go deep so much, when the middle was open. I believe we would have been better served having Clausen completing short crossing routes, than Ainge throwing 15 yds. over our WR's heads.

GatorNation
09-19-2005, 07:25 PM
Should have known that a Gator would get in this thread and demand respect for his team. Isn't the victory enough? J/K by the way.

Tennessee stopped running the ball. The OC and possibly Fulmer outthought themselves. They saw man coverage on the outside and believed it was the way to beat the Gators. The only problem is that the QB position was not the strong point, needed to do so. The Gators also loaded the box up with 8 and sometimes 9 in the box. They dared UT to throw it. UT did and could not complete enough passes. The co Defensive coordiantors of the Gators deserve credit for adjusting. The Vols offensive braintrust never adjusted correctly.

Tennessee use to have an identity as a power running football team. It use to be about imposing their will on the opponent. While you do have to gameplan and adjust to what the defense gives you, your team has to have an identity and they need to stick to it. Tennessee was domintating the Florida defense by running the ball to the left side. Florida adjusted and added more men to the box. Tennessee did not even try to run the ball. The braintrust said, lets throw deep, because that is what they are giving us. Where is the identity of the Volunteers.

Tennessee was not able to sustain drives in the second half. Tennessee did not run the ball. The defense had to see more time on the field and wore down towards the end of the game. The special teams lost the game with their blunders. The offense did not do anything to help the team in the second half. The Vols coaching staff took the best offensive weapon(Riggs) and relegated him to a blocker or receiver. What is wrong with this picture?


LOL....haha, alright. Fair enough. And I agree....the left side was there for a while; then we started slanting into the left side and filling the gaps with opposite flow from the LBs to cover the zone cutback. We thought going in that our DBs could cover your WRs, and that's why we cheated a bit on the run. V. Brown may be short, but Heater did a really nice job of teaching him new techniques in order to compensate for his lack of size.

I think going to the air was a good idea.....you have to test it, and after a while, power running teams run their way right out of their gameplan. At some point, the running clock works against you....so you have to throw it. I agree, though, UT went away from the running game far too early. I think UT finished the second half with -4 yards rushing. That's not Tennessee football. What confused me was that Fulmer kept throwing to Webb's side.

utn_vols_1
09-19-2005, 08:12 PM
I agree with almost all points but on the receivers. If the QB's would have waited 1 to 2 seconds longer our receivers would have broke open down the sidelines. Most I saw the QB had time to wait and the receivers were starting to get separation before the ball got there about one stride length. QB's inexperience seems to me. Our receivers would have had to reach back to touch the backs shoulder so he was starting to get separation. Just like the one that was over thrown on the 1st play I think it was. I think their backs stayed with our receivers for 15 to 20 yard then ours were breaking loose. I notice a lot of ball thrown low or the receivers had to go up high for it. One pass I thought was going to be intercepted but we came down with it in a crowd great job by the receiver don't remember who sorry. Plus like you said when your not running the ball in the 2nd half the D can pin its ears back and not rush as many. Receivers nightmare. Ainge made almost a great throw to the endzone that was finely called an incomplete pass catchable yes thrown on a frozen rope yes very very hard catch to make. You might want to look at the Receivers a little more kindly. They are not all to blame here. Maybe a C+ or B just my opinion for what its worth. ;)

GatorNation
09-19-2005, 10:59 PM
I agree with almost all points but on the receivers. If the QB's would have waited 1 to 2 seconds longer our receivers would have broke open down the sidelines. Most I saw the QB had time to wait and the receivers were starting to get separation before the ball got there about one stride length. QB's inexperience seems to me. Our receivers would have had to reach back to touch the backs shoulder so he was starting to get separation. Just like the one that was over thrown on the 1st play I think it was. I think their backs stayed with our receivers for 15 to 20 yard then ours were breaking loose. I notice a lot of ball thrown low or the receivers had to go up high for it. One pass I thought was going to be intercepted but we came down with it in a crowd great job by the receiver don't remember who sorry. Plus like you said when your not running the ball in the 2nd half the D can pin its ears back and not rush as many. Receivers nightmare. Ainge made almost a great throw to the endzone that was finely called an incomplete pass catchable yes thrown on a frozen rope yes very very hard catch to make. You might want to look at the Receivers a little more kindly. They are not all to blame here. Maybe a C+ or B just my opinion for what its worth. ;)


I think it was back and forth. I saw Webb. Nelson, and Brown stride for stride many times, too.