View Full Version : USC vs. Alabama Your Opinions??????
I personally see USC taking charge in this game. Alabama now is NOT the Alabama of the past and USC is the total opposite. I haven't seen the USC football team this fired up in a long time and I think they are going to go to Bama and be ready to play. With the next three (3) games being at Alabama, Ole Miss, and at Kentucky they have a good shot of being bowl eligible before hitting the November "orange" streak. USC's offense has been sloppy from time to time but their defense is making up for the offensive errors. This USC squad looks a lot like the 9-3-0 squad of 2001. The offense is marginal sometimes flashy but, the defense is what really shined that year and this year.
Alabama I think is going to dwell on this loss to Arkansas and reality has set in. They weren't just defeated, they (Bama) were stomped. If anything, Summers will be healthy and he will take a lot of heat off of our passing game. If that goes well, expect Mr. Holtz to do some major clock management and let the defense take us to the promiseland.
USC 21
Alabama 17
Any comments????
Chris
09-26-2004, 02:04 PM
Alabama I think is going to dwell on this loss to Arkansas and reality has set in. They weren't just defeated, they (Bama) were stomped.
huh? Are we talking about the game YESTERDAY against Arkansas? Yes, the score is an indication of a one sided victory; however the stats and the game play show otherwise. Arkansas looked like a Florida of old for 3-4 drives, other than that Alabama dominated the game defensively. Offense was another story... Run was superb, but Gullion did not impress. A loss is loss, but STOMPED? Come now....
DAWG@heart
09-26-2004, 05:10 PM
I don't know about that. I have to disagree with USC taking "charge". Yea, they played well against UGA, but they ran out of gas against UGA. USC has to go to Tuscaloosa, Alabama ran the ball well against Arkansas and Arkansas did well stopping Heisman Canidate Cedric Benson of Texas. If Alabama runs against USC like Arkansas, I believe USC will run out of gas again and Gullion will be able to pass the ball against a tired defense. It will be a close game, but the 4th quarter is going to kill USC. They have only scored 14 points, 7 against Vandy and 7 against South Florida, in the 4th quarter this year and Vandy or South Florida's D is not as good as Alabama's. I expect a similar game to that of UGA vs. USC. South Carolina will score and possibly lead going into halftime, but they will tire and lose in the 4th quarter.
Alabama - 24
South Carolina - 20
usafvolfan
09-26-2004, 10:10 PM
SC should take Bama without too much problem. Sorry Bama fans, but the Tide sucks the big one this year. 7-4 if your lucky. More likely 6-4 or 5-5 year end.
I seriously hope Bama fans still dont think they are gonna come to Rocky Top and give UT a run. We gonna thump the S**T out of of them in knoxville. But first, the gamecocks are gonna give em an a** whoppin.
volimhtown
09-26-2004, 10:59 PM
I have to agree that SC should handle Bama pretty easily...that being said, every time I'm ready to jump on the Cock bandwagon, they go out and look like...well, South Carolina!! Had Carolina not choked and beat GA, I'd really like Bama in this game, it would be too SC-like to have Beaten GA and lose to a mediocre Bama team. Anyways, I'd really stay away from this game if you're a gambling man. SC has the edge on paper, but this could be one of those classic "traps" for the Cocks!!
On another note, Hey Bama...if you really think you still have a good football program, why can't you recruit a decent quarterback? I know this sounds like I'm just talking trash, but I'm being respectfully serious. Who was the last good (not great) quarterback you guys had? How can a prestigious program like Bama not recruit a decent quarterback?? I don't understand!! Anyways, good luck against the Cocks... you're gonna need it!!!
Hey Chris,
When I say "stomped", I meant the score. 27 to 10 is a dominating score.
In my humble opinion, the last GREAT QB Alabama had was Jay Barker. He is also the winningiest QB in Bama history I think.
Chris
09-27-2004, 12:54 AM
DeLoreanfan1 - oh ok...hehe! Its all in fun from our chairs anyhow....
Hey Bama...if you really think you still have a good football program, why can't you recruit a decent quarterback?
No, you are in your full rights to question this.... The response I give is... Why would a top notch passer go to a run oriented program? I was raised in Tuscaloosa and love the Tide, but I am happy to see someone breaking the Bear Mold and moving to more of an open offense now. Go Shula!
usafvolfan
09-27-2004, 09:23 AM
i think bama will get beat by SC, however, i also believe i over-rated the gamecocks. only beating troy by a touchdown? at first i was a little concerned about the vols traveling to columbia this year. not any longer. if that is the best they can do, my vols will beat the crap out of the gamecocks.
forgetit1947
09-27-2004, 09:36 AM
This IS the SEC. I rate the game a toss-up at best.
Have yall noticed that there has been no mention of USC's WR Troy Williamson in the national media. On other sites, they are screaming that this guy should be nominated for the Heisman Trophy. If he keeps up this pace, I really cannot disagree with them. Through 4 games his stats are as follows:
19 recs for 545 yards and 4 TD's. (28.7 average yards per catch)
Do yall think he's Heisman material????
I don't know about that. I have to disagree with USC taking "charge". Yea, they played well against UGA, but they ran out of gas against UGA. USC has to go to Tuscaloosa, Alabama ran the ball well against Arkansas and Arkansas did well stopping Heisman Canidate Cedric Benson of Texas. If Alabama runs against USC like Arkansas, I believe USC will run out of gas again and Gullion will be able to pass the ball against a tired defense. It will be a close game, but the 4th quarter is going to kill USC. They have only scored 14 points, 7 against Vandy and 7 against South Florida, in the 4th quarter this year and Vandy or South Florida's D is not as good as Alabama's. I expect a similar game to that of UGA vs. USC. South Carolina will score and possibly lead going into halftime, but they will tire and lose in the 4th quarter.
Alabama - 24
South Carolina - 20
It's not the fact that USC tired out in the 4th quarter, Mr. Holtz has said publicly time and time before it's his ULTRA CONSERVATIVE play calling. Mr Holtz did the same thing at Notre Dame if you remember. When he got a lead, no matter how big, he ran plays that DID NOT risk a turnover. Sometimes that works, sometimes it doesn't. Like the old saying:
"No guts, no glory!"
USAVOL,
That's pretty boastful considering we tore your butts up last year at Rocky Top. Yall won by a measly 2 pts. We had yall beat all day long but, UT pulled it out in overtime. Shoot, Summers had 165 yards rushing and something along the lines of 84 yards receiving too. Right now, USC has the 16th ranked defense in the nation and ranked 6th in the nation (Scoring defense). I would not say that UT is going to STOMP USC in Columbia. I think that your freshman QB's are going to get up and close with USC's LB Ricardo Hurley and DE George Gause. LOL That's going to be the first REAL test of the program this year.
i think bama will get beat by SC, however, i also believe i over-rated the gamecocks. only beating troy by a touchdown? at first i was a little concerned about the vols traveling to columbia this year. not any longer. if that is the best they can do, my vols will beat the crap out of the gamecocks.
By the way, USC beat Troy 17-7.
Troy is no joke or fluke. They beat Marshall and 17th ranked Missouri back to back. Ask those two teams if they think Troy is a bunch of chumps. Better yet, ask any LSU fan on October 24th what they honestly think of Troy. To ridicule USC for not stomping Troy is just crazy! Troy is here to stay and play.
oxfordrebel
09-28-2004, 08:52 AM
I'm calling U of SC in this one. Bama is ok, but not of the caliber that everyone in the Tide nation wanted it to be going into the year. Croyle supplied great leadership and was able to manufacture some wins. They lose this one in a semi-close one (by 7 or 10 points, but no more than 14).
As far as the last great Bama QB, I'd say Jay Barker also, but you have to admit that Croyle is one heck of a QB. He has speed, ability, and leadership. No way I'd risk having him hurt in a game or something...
Ditto Oxford...
It's going to be close. I say USC 21 Alabama 17
NeutralObserver
09-28-2004, 11:53 AM
Keep in mind, folks, that South Carolina fans aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer. They believe they belong on the SEC, but haven't figured out yet that the only reason the SEC added the Chickens to the league was to give Vanderbilt someone to play each year.
So, don't take this Chicken fan's predictions too seriously.
Don't you mean "in the SEC". Now who's the sharpest in the drawer...LOL
NeutralObserver
09-28-2004, 01:42 PM
Don't you mean "in the SEC". Now who's the sharpest in the drawer...LOL
Oh, are we going to nit-pick typos? If that's the game you want to play, any first grader knows you put the period inside the end-quotation mark.
You typed: Don't you mean "in the SEC". The correct punctuation would be: Don't you mean "In the SEC." You always place a period or comma INSIDE the quotation mark.
If you are going to try to correct someone else's typos, you should at least do so using correct punctuation. Doing otherwise only diminishes what little credibility you have.
I don't have a "credibility" problem. You do...My credibility has been earned here.
volimhtown
09-28-2004, 01:50 PM
Actually Neutral....you are wrong. When quoting someone or something, the period goes outside the quotation marks, so DeLorean was correct. Trust me, I've recently been taking some courses! Why are you trashing SC anyways?? Holtz has made them really respectable!! WOW...you just made an ass of yourself!!! HAHA
NeutralObserver
09-28-2004, 02:16 PM
Actually Neutral....you are wrong. When quoting someone or something, the period goes outside the quotation marks, so DeLorean was correct. Trust me, I've recently been taking some courses! Why are you trashing SC anyways?? Holtz has made them really respectable!! WOW...you just made an ass of yourself!!! HAHA
Wow, you've been taking courses. I guess that makes you an expert. When did they start offering English and punctuation in trade school?
Take it from someone who has been earning his living as a writer, DeLorean was not correct in his utilization of punctuation. A period or comma NEVER go outside a quotation mark. We learned that basic rule in grade school (of course, I didn't attend school in the South, so one can understand how I would comprehend this basic rule more so than some of you).
I guess it's you, Volimhtown, who has made an ass of yourself. But, that's okay.
Let me know when you finish those courses on English and punctuation.
VOLIM,
Don't pay him any attention. He's not worth it.
dudeman0501
09-28-2004, 02:56 PM
Alright guys, get this thread back on topic...
Either way, like the story I wrote. I analyzied both teams position by position and it looks like USC has the advantage. I said it once and I'll say it again, 21-17 USC.
huckle23
09-28-2004, 03:19 PM
I'll agree with South Carolina winning, Croyle is going to hurt Alabama and South Carolina could definitely surprise some folks before this year is over with a few good wins. I think it's by a touchdown though.
hognutt209
09-28-2004, 03:52 PM
This game really seems like a toss up from an unbiased perspective. Alabama is tough with that run game and has a very solid D. I have not seen much of USC this year so it is hard to say what I think of them. In the SEC it is so hard to win on the road so maybe a slight edge to Bama, but they may throw in the towel after Croyle and the loss to my Hogs. Alabama really pointed at last weeks game as a return to the national scene.
By the way Hog, where did you hear about this website? That is, if you don't mind me asking.
Just wait Hog. USC has changed this year quite a bit and there are going to be a few upsets. As long as they keep playing the way they are playing, the SEC East is going to be tight! lol
I don't think we can win the East or even finish second but I believe a win at Bama is attainable. If someone made me bet all of my money on who is gonna win this Saturday I'd go with Bama. I hope the Gamecocks prove me wrong though.
Jay_Lupo
09-28-2004, 05:56 PM
I think it's a great matchup and it will be close, but after watching them play last week in person, i'm going to have to go w/ Bama. They were not "stomped" by Arkansas. That was a tough victory for the Hogs. Alabama's backs, especially Hudson, tore us up. Those were two even teams with the exception of the quarterback, and with Arkansas, that's usually the case. There is no substitute for Matt Jones and he'll give them a chance to win any game.
I don't think South Carolina's defense will be able to hold up like the Razorback defense did last week. I see a close, defensive football game, with Alabama's Hudson being the difference.
I think things are hinging on whether Demetris Summers will play. With him and Cory Boyd in the backfield, they can do some damage to that Bama defense. I am staying with my prediction. USC 21 Alabama 17
SCTAO
09-30-2004, 09:19 AM
I don't know about that. I have to disagree with USC taking "charge". Yea, they played well against UGA, but they ran out of gas against UGA. USC has to go to Tuscaloosa, Alabama ran the ball well against Arkansas and Arkansas did well stopping Heisman Canidate Cedric Benson of Texas. If Alabama runs against USC like Arkansas, I believe USC will run out of gas again and Gullion will be able to pass the ball against a tired defense. It will be a close game, but the 4th quarter is going to kill USC. They have only scored 14 points, 7 against Vandy and 7 against South Florida, in the 4th quarter this year and Vandy or South Florida's D is not as good as Alabama's. I expect a similar game to that of UGA vs. USC. South Carolina will score and possibly lead going into halftime, but they will tire and lose in the 4th quarter.
Alabama - 24
South Carolina - 20
Newton plays the whole game against UGA and it is a different story.
-SCTAO
SCTAO
09-30-2004, 09:24 AM
Just so you guys know, Neutral Observer is from the forums over at www.thestate.com. He does nothing but trash the GameCocks. He claims to be Neutral but is clearly a Clemson fan. In any case, back to the subject.
-SCTAO
rolltide5590
09-30-2004, 06:47 PM
guys u under rate the tide...just because u guys don't have 12 nat. champships.well the tide will kill the vols and usc.and give our qb some time he will be great by the end of the year,because if he wasnt he would not be at alabama...roll tide
guys u under rate the tide...just because u guys don't have 12 nat. champships.well the tide will kill the vols and usc.and give our qb some time he will be great by the end of the year,because if he wasnt he would not be at alabama...roll tide
Dude...Are you off your freakin meds or something? You are getting dellusional now. Alabama does not have that good of a squad this year. There's nothing wrong with team-spirit but let's come back down to reality.
yeah, bama is no pushover and should beat us, although if for some act of God holtz doesn't put in Pinkins as QB, then the ballgame is a different story, you Bama fans better hope Pinkins plays and that holtz continues to be stubborn....
Nooga Vol
10-01-2004, 02:13 PM
sorry if I ruffle any feathers in the 'cock nation, but I don't think they'll take bama this week. They peter'd out against UGA (should've won, but ran out of gas at the end). Granted bama isn't the same as UGA, but still, I don't think they have what it takes to win in Tuscaloosa.
cheaters 17
cocks 14
sorry if I ruffle any feathers in the 'cock nation, but I don't think they'll take bama this week. They peter'd out against UGA (should've won, but ran out of gas at the end). Granted bama isn't the same as UGA, but still, I don't think they have what it takes to win in Tuscaloosa.
cheaters 17
cocks 14
USC didn't really run out of gas because if you remember, USC was on UGA's 11 yard line when the fumble occured. Like I have stated before, It is the coaches "CONSERVATIVE" play calling that gave UGA that game.
Nooga Vol
10-01-2004, 03:15 PM
USC didn't really run out of gas because if you remember, USC was on UGA's 11 yard line when the fumble occured. Like I have stated before, It is the coaches "CONSERVATIVE" play calling that gave UGA that game.
that's true, maybe I should rephrase and say USC's defense ran out of gas. They shouldn't have let UGA get the lead in order for that fumble to be a factor. Conservative play calling is a good way to maintain a lead, so long as the defense stays in the game and keeps them off the scoreboard. The same thing can be said for the gators, the blown call shouldn't have been an issue had they kept UT from scoring the final TD that put them within 1 point.
I hope USC spanks the cheaters in crimson and I wish them the best of luck!!!
volimhtown
10-01-2004, 09:18 PM
guys u under rate the tide...just because u guys don't have 12 nat. champships.well the tide will kill the vols and usc.and give our qb some time he will be great by the end of the year,because if he wasnt he would not be at alabama...roll tide
I don't mean to offend anyone, but this was too tempting! Since you folks in Bama are so proud of the number 12 (largely because there's nothing else about Alabama football that would impress anyone, lately), I did some investigating and found out just how important the number 12 is in the great state of Alabama.
12...represents the average number of teeth that the average Bama citizen has,
12...represents the average number of siblings per resident,
12...represents the average number of conference wins per graduating class since '90 against teams besides Vandy and Kentucky
12...represents the average number of attempts it takes for the average citizen to correctly spell the word Alabama
12...represents the average age in years of a vehicle registered in the state of Alabama
12...represents the number of players Alabama will have to play on each play to have a chance in hell to beat Tennessee this year!
It's a good thing that you have this love affair with the number 12 and are so comfortable with it, because it doesn't look like that you are going to have to worry about banner #13 for a long, long, LONG TIME!!!
Chris
10-02-2004, 02:35 PM
I don't mean to offend anyone, but this was too tempting! Since you folks in Bama are so proud of the number 12 (largely because there's nothing else about Alabama football that would impress anyone, lately), I did some investigating and found out just how important the number 12 is in the great state of Alabama.
12...represents the average number of teeth that the average Bama citizen has,
12...represents the average number of siblings per resident,
12...represents the average number of conference wins per graduating class since '90 against teams besides Vandy and Kentucky
12...represents the average number of attempts it takes for the average citizen to correctly spell the word Alabama
12...represents the average age in years of a vehicle registered in the state of Alabama
12...represents the number of players Alabama will have to play on each play to have a chance in hell to beat Tennessee this year!
It's a good thing that you have this love affair with the number 12 and are so comfortable with it, because it doesn't look like that you are going to have to worry about banner #13 for a long, long, LONG TIME!!!
And you forgot. 12 - The average iq of a Vols Fan!
It's all in fun here, let's take it all light!
And I save my Alabama / SC prediction for the last minute. (2hr27min to go)
http://www.sectalk.com/boards/images/logos/South_Carolina.gifAThttp://www.sectalk.com/boards/images/logos/Alabama.gif
South Carolina 10 / Alabama 24
JaGuArApRiL
10-03-2004, 10:07 AM
If reading you guys nitpick is the best you have to offer...Im gonna start reading Newsboy's post...<evil grin at those and their previous comments>. USC is up and coming and they proved at the Alabama game that they can bring it just as well as any other team. Coach Holtz made some amazing decisions and I definately have a new respect for USC. Just ask Deloreanfan1, if anyone thought USC would lose to Bama orginally it was me. As for UGA...I didn't post cause I knew they'd Spank LSU and send them crying home to Mama. It was an awesome game. Oh and just so Chris doesn't kick me off the site faster than I can spell ALABAMA... They are a great team too...just an off day. Oh and the last comment...cause I already see it coming...If you think demeaning my reply by saying Dont listen to her because she's a Woman and/or a UK Fan. You can bite me...cause I really don't care what you think.
Chris
10-03-2004, 12:38 PM
Oh and just so Chris doesn't kick me off the site faster than I can spell ALABAMA... They are a great team too...just an off day.
Chris does not kick people off because they disagee wih him... hehe
Speak your mind...
Jordan
10-03-2004, 04:27 PM
One thing that struck me the other day about "12"....
Yes, we've got 12 National Championships that we're proud of.
But also, this marks 12 years since our most recent one. :)
Need to step it up a notch or it's going to be approaching 15 years very fast.
SCTAO
10-03-2004, 09:34 PM
Well, we won.
That's all I have to say about that.
-SCTAO
definately well put, 2 more and we're going bowling!!
NeutralObserver
10-04-2004, 04:00 PM
definately well put, 2 more and we're going bowling!!
There's a typical Chicken post. Chicken fans believe qualifying for a bowl is quite the accomplishment. Then again, six wins in Columbia has been quite the rarity over the 100+ years of Chicken football.
Do SEC fans realize that the University of South Carolina has won just three -- THREE -- bowl games in its entire history. And those three wins were in minor bowls. Three minor bowl wins in 100+ years. Isn't that pitiful?
DAWG@heart
10-04-2004, 05:07 PM
hmmmmm... let's think about this for a second. The word is that you are a Clemson fan.
First, the SEC history angle that you seem to bring up.
1. How many championships of any kind does your conference have vs. the number of National Championships the SEC has? And don't count your new additions either since they have not contributed to the conference as of yet.
2. How many bowl wins or 8 win seasons does Clemson have? Whatever that number might be, it wouldn't be that high if you played in the SEC.
3. Clemson was never good enough for the SEC. That's why you play in the ACC.
4. Instead of playing Duke, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech and North Carolina ever year, why don't you try playing Georgia, Florida, Alabama and either Auburn or LSU every year? Think your record would be a winning one in that kind of season?
5. How many times has your team played in the Sugar Bowl, Orange Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, or the Rose Bowl? I recall once. I can't use my fingers, toes, and pecker to count how many times SEC teams have been there.
Now, let's talk about now......
Clemson - 1-3
South Carolina - 3-1
And Clemson didn't have to play Georgia. It would have sucked if you did. Hope you enjoyed that win over South Carolina last year. The "chickens" are stick their "COCKS" right up your a-hole.
hmmmmm... let's think about this for a second. The word is that you are a Clemson fan.
First, the SEC history angle that you seem to bring up.
1. How many championships of any kind does your conference have vs. the number of National Championships the SEC has? And don't count your new additions either since they have not contributed to the conference as of yet.
2. How many bowl wins or 8 win seasons does Clemson have? Whatever that number might be, it wouldn't be that high if you played in the SEC.
3. Clemson was never good enough for the SEC. That's why you play in the ACC.
4. Instead of playing Duke, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech and North Carolina ever year, why don't you try playing Georgia, Florida, Alabama and either Auburn or LSU every year? Think your record would be a winning one in that kind of season?
5. How many times has your team played in the Sugar Bowl, Orange Bowl, Fiesta Bowl, or the Rose Bowl? I recall once. I can't use my fingers, toes, and pecker to count how many times SEC teams have been there.
Now, let's talk about now......
Clemson - 1-3
South Carolina - 3-1
And Clemson didn't have to play Georgia. It would have sucked if you did. Hope you enjoyed that win over South Carolina last year. The "chickens" are stick their "COCKS" right up your a-hole.
Get em' DAWG!!! LOL NO, if you think the two (2) Outback Bowl victories are "minor" bowls then you need your head examined!
NeutralObserver
10-05-2004, 09:20 AM
Actually, Dawg, I am NOT a Clemson fan. Far from it. I just call them like I see them.
Is the Outback Bowl part of the BCS? I didn't think so. Bowls that make up the BCS are major bowls by all estimates. Non BCS bowls are considered minor.
Thems the facts. It's funny. Facts are pesky little things that tend to get in the way of fiction.
DAWG@heart
10-05-2004, 09:32 AM
So, what you are saying is if a team goes 9-2 and goes to "minor bowl" then they are mediocre. Look tigger, only 8 teams out of 117 play in your "major bowl" pitch and only 2 play for it all. That is a terrible way to measure a team due to what bowl they play in. Going bowling is not always about how good you are. Bowl games are money-driven, that's it. It doesn't matter if the heads of the bowl committee want to see a game between top teams. Whichever team will make them the most money is who they pick.
As for Carolina, 2 10-2 seasons and two thumpings of Ohio St. in the Outback Bowl is not "pitiful" as you put it. Remember, Ohio St. won it all the year after South Carolina smacked them in the Outback Bowl.
Now, those are the facts. Open wide and swallow that pill.
He's definately a Clemtech fan who bangs his sister (his sister being a goat in Pickens County, SC)....
Actually, Dawg, I am NOT a Clemson fan. Far from it. I just call them like I see them.
Is the Outback Bowl part of the BCS? I didn't think so. Bowls that make up the BCS are major bowls by all estimates. Non BCS bowls are considered minor.
Thems the facts. It's funny. Facts are pesky little things that tend to get in the way of fiction.
Those are your opinions. College football, ESPN and Fox Sports Net have a different opinion though. Examples of major/minor non-BCS bowls:
Major: Capital One, Outback and Cotton
Minor: Continental Tire, Houston, Independence and Las Vegas
Now those are the facts my friend.
walkon
10-05-2004, 09:05 PM
If that goes well, expect Mr. Holtz to do some major clock management and let the defense take us to the promiseland.
USC 21
Alabama 17
Any comments????[/QUOTE]
So swami any predictions on this weeks game. And how reliable are your sources on the Spurrier thing?
If that goes well, expect Mr. Holtz to do some major clock management and let the defense take us to the promiseland.
USC 21
Alabama 17
Any comments????
So swami any predictions on this weeks game. And how reliable are your sources on the Spurrier thing?[/QUOTE]
You can read my preview on the Miss/USC game on the front page. My other predictions will be coming out in the next day or so.
Even though I live in Monroe, NC. I still have a lot of friends and contacts at the university. Let's just say that the "Spurrier" thing was told to me by someone that's in the Athletics Administration division of the university.
walkon
10-06-2004, 03:50 PM
"There's a typical Chicken post. Chicken fans believe qualifying for a bowl is quite the accomplishment. Then again, six wins in Columbia has been quite the rarity over the 100+ years of Chicken football.
Do SEC fans realize that the University of South Carolina has won just three -- THREE -- bowl games in its entire history. And those three wins were in minor bowls. Three minor bowl wins in 100+ years. Isn't that pitiful?"
Why are you all over the internet bashing USC? What exactly is wrong with members of the community supporting there team. What do you have against USC and there very loyal fans? So the football program has been average to below average for many years. A few successes here and there. They are competitive. If you deny that then you are lying. I have seen you at the State Newspaper forum and now here spewing your thoughtless counter intuitive opinions. What other team do you bash besides USC? None that I have seen. So I ask you why?
Let's take a vote to kick his ass off of the website, someone start a thread so that dudeman and Chris can see it, he obviously isn't bringing anything to this website....
Let's take a vote to kick his ass off of the website, someone start a thread so that dudeman and Chris can see it, he obviously isn't bringing anything to this website....
I agree RW. Granted, we all do not see eye to eye all of the time but we do stop shy of taking "pot shots" at each other. When everyone joined this webpage, we all agreed to bring something constructive to this site and Neutral Observer has done the exact opposite.
dudeman0501
10-07-2004, 03:08 PM
It seems like he's only here to cause trouble. For now, try to ignore it. Remember, everyone has an Ingore List (http://www.sectalk.com/boards/faq.php?faq=vb_user_maintain#faq_vb_buddy_explain) .
If he continues, some sort of action will be taken.
And, with that, I close this thread. It has gone far off the trail of USC vs. Alabama.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.