Jump to content

Welcome to SECTalk.com

Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The Home of 6 Straight National Titles!

You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, sports betting, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!

If you have any problems registering or signing in, please contact us.

Latest Topics

Latest News

Top Bettors

Top High Fived



Member Since 11 Jul 2010
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 08:04 PM

Will Smiths son wants to be a TAMU fan....

18 July 2016 - 04:14 PM


Showed up on my Facebook feed.

Crying Wolf and The rest of the story

10 July 2016 - 07:20 AM

Why does anyone still think cops randomly shot poor innocent black males? Every national case has started the same, poor innocent black male minding his own business is killed for walking while black or driving while black.

Then come the great slogans, hands up, I can't breathe, a bag of skittles etc.. And every damn time we learn that the wolf is just a load of crap. Hands up turned out to be a strong arm robber that attacked a cop, I can't breathe saw every officer cleared of any wrong doing, the bag of skittles was an ingredient to make homemade hooch and attacked a citizen.

Well the guy in MN was an armed robbery suspect and the guy in LA was a convicted felon with a gun in his lap that reached for it.

At some point a bad cop is laughing because the idiots have cried wolf so many times he is free to operate in the open. Maybe not yet but soon, no one will believe these fools calling wolf anymore.

UT Accusers got paid

05 July 2016 - 08:40 PM

UT no longer has an ongoing title IX case. 2.48 million including legal fees. Looks like they will each get around 600,000 before taxes.

Links to the press conference from UTs AD and the attorney for the plaintiffs

*****very NSFW*****


Local Judge makes the Drudge Report...

11 June 2016 - 08:57 PM


So the name change requirements in Ga include a clause about they cannot be confusing to the public. Chick wants to pretend she has a dick and wants a more male name. Judge says no, it's confusing to the public, causes safety issues and can lead to fraud or believe of fraud. Siting insurance as one of the issues of fraud. Judge Roper request that a more gender neutral name be picked.

I'm on the fence on this one. I get where the judge is coming from and agree that name changes that confuse or intent to confuse should be rejected but at the same time if the chick wants a dick (i.e. Has a fake dick attached) the it's moot. As it stands is an insurance company able to deny a chick that thinks she should have had a dick female related treatment because the identify as a dude?

I don't get the issues behind transgender health care

08 June 2016 - 08:48 AM

Why can't they just get a plan based on what they were born with?