preliminary pseudo-BCS rankings published - SEC Football Talk - SECTalk.com

Jump to content

Welcome to SECTalk.com

Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The Home of 6 Straight National Titles!

You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, sports betting, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!

If you have any problems registering or signing in, please contact us.

preliminary pseudo-BCS rankings published

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic

#1
corona79

corona79
  • Members
  • Pip
  • Posts:
    23
  • Joined:
    Jan 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    0
here  (a day late thanks to Massey)

#2
Fatty

Fatty
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    294
  • Joined:
    Jul 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    21

corona79 said:

here (a day late thanks to Massey)

Not sure who did these, but they're off pretty badly.

#3
azamugg

azamugg

    Banned

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    16,112
  • Joined:
    Dec 2005
  • Cash:
    0

Fatty said:

Not sure who did these, but they're off pretty badly.



u not so smart hu
Posted Image
Posted Image

Posted Image

#4
Fatty

Fatty
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    294
  • Joined:
    Jul 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    21
The rankings for FL are off.  FL is #7 in both the AP and coaches poll and the computer rankings have them anywhere from #2 (Sagarin) to #5.

When you throw out the outliers (top and bottom computer scores) FL's computer contribution ranking would be somewhere around 3 or 4.

It's not possible (mathematically) for UF to be ranked 1/3 at 7, 1/3 at 7 and 1/3 at 4 and arrive at a total ranking of 9.

Someone needs to check their spreadsheet, algorythm, formula or whatever.  It's off.

#5
Fatty

Fatty
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    294
  • Joined:
    Jul 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    21
I found it.

There's a mistake in FL's AP points.  They scored 1132 points in the AP poll (not 0132 points like in their spreadsheet).  This should correct FL's position in the BCS projections.

#6
GatorUnvrsty

GatorUnvrsty

    AdminisGator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    25,087
  • Joined:
    Dec 2006
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    4,176

Fatty said:

I found it.

There's a mistake in FL's AP points.  They scored 1132 points in the AP poll (not 0132 points like in their spreadsheet).  This should correct FL's position in the BCS projections.

Exactly, the guy shorted us 1000 points from the AP poll, and put our AP percentage at .0880, when it's really .8800... that will make a huge difference.
Posted Image