East/West Power Structure for 2014 - Page 12 - SEC Football Talk - SECTalk.com - Page 12

Jump to content

Welcome to SECTalk.com

Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The Home of 6 Straight National Titles!

You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, sports betting, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!

If you have any problems registering or signing in, please contact us.


Countdown to Kickoff
6134816
DaysHoursMinutesSeconds
Countdown Jersey Thread


Latest Topics


Latest News


Top High Fived

Top Bettors


East/West Power Structure for 2014

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
224 replies to this topic

#166
possumslayer

possumslayer

    Orange & White Supremacist

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Posts:
    6,956
  • Age:
    48
  • Joined:
    Oct 2013
  • Location:
    Lincoln county Tennessee
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    3,047

View Posthog_heaven, on 23 March 2014 - 08:28 PM, said:



Your question makes no sense. Please retype in English the rest of is can understand.
me knew what he mint....

#167
WDavE

WDavE
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    3,342
  • Age:
    61
  • Joined:
    Sep 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    261

View PostRamboMizzou, on 24 March 2014 - 12:42 PM, said:

Three things I noticed about this thread.

1. My fellow Mizzou fans aren't very confident in this team even though I think we will be stronger and better next year. That offense should be the best in the conference. Defense is yet to be seen but we had games where we didn't have Gaines in our secondary and did fine and that to me is the biggest question mark right now in my honest opinion.

2. Mizzou has a pretty favorable schedule other than playing USC at their place. We have Dylan Thompson's number though so far so I am pretty optimistic.

3. DJSDAWG is a faggot.


I would change your statement about your offense to one of the best.

Missouri finished 5th last year in total offense.

1. A&M  Lost Mr. football at QB
2. Alabama Lost their starting QB
3. Auburn Lost our leading rusher
4. UGA Lost their starting QB.

Auburn right now has three QB's on the roster that have started games in their career.
"If a Laundromat in Tuscaloosa wants to pick Alabama No. 1, we'll claim it." -- Paul W. Bryant

#168
cocky4ever

cocky4ever
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    16,943
  • Age:
    32
  • Joined:
    Dec 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    12,957

View PostWDavE, on 24 March 2014 - 01:25 PM, said:




I would change your statement about your offense to one of the best.

Missouri finished 5th last year in total offense.

1. A&M  Lost Mr. football at QB
2. Alabama Lost their starting QB
3. Auburn Lost our leading rusher
4. UGA Lost their starting QB.

Auburn right now has three QB's on the roster that have started games in their career.

And Mizzou didn't lose anyone on offense....or at least that's what I read somewhere.

#169
WDavE

WDavE
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    3,342
  • Age:
    61
  • Joined:
    Sep 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    261

View Postcocky4ever, on 24 March 2014 - 01:32 PM, said:

And Mizzou didn't lose anyone on offense....or at least that's what I read somewhere.

They lost their stating QB from last year. They do however have a backup that played a lot last year and started some.
I show they lost senior wide outs: Lucas 58 recp, Washington 50 recp, and Clark with 10
LT starter and backup: Britt and Gatti
LG Copeland

Auburn has 8 starters back on offense. Losses LT, FB and RB.

Edited by WDavE, 24 March 2014 - 01:58 PM.

"If a Laundromat in Tuscaloosa wants to pick Alabama No. 1, we'll claim it." -- Paul W. Bryant

#170
cocky4ever

cocky4ever
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    16,943
  • Age:
    32
  • Joined:
    Dec 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    12,957

View PostWDavE, on 24 March 2014 - 01:55 PM, said:



They lost their stating QB from last year. They do however have a backup that played a lot last year and started some.
I show they lost senior wide outs: Lucas 58 recp, Washington 50 recp, and Clark with 10
LT starter and backup: Britt and Gatti
LG Copeland

Auburn has 8 starters back on offense. Losses LT, FB and RB.

I know. Just referencing the Mizzou fan who told me they didn't lose anything. They also lost their best RB...but it's ok because he was only the "co" starter.

#171
L.A.Hog

L.A.Hog

    Go Hogs,Pilgrim

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Posts:
    8,454
  • Age:
    57
  • Joined:
    Feb 2009
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    5,496
Looks like nobody's gonna lose.How the hell we gonna work that?

#172
WDavE

WDavE
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    3,342
  • Age:
    61
  • Joined:
    Sep 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    261

View PostL.A.Hog, on 24 March 2014 - 02:15 PM, said:

Looks like nobody's gonna lose.How the hell we gonna work that?

12 ties......
"If a Laundromat in Tuscaloosa wants to pick Alabama No. 1, we'll claim it." -- Paul W. Bryant

#173
L.A.Hog

L.A.Hog

    Go Hogs,Pilgrim

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • Posts:
    8,454
  • Age:
    57
  • Joined:
    Feb 2009
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    5,496
Works for me.

#174
Tider27

Tider27

    Bammer Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    37,920
  • Age:
    26
  • Joined:
    Jun 2007
  • Location:
    West AL
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    14,256
There should have been a predict the title game score tie breaker.

.

.

.

Posted Image


#175
bbqit

bbqit
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    17,319
  • Age:
    54
  • Joined:
    Dec 2004
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    6,280
We ain't gonna lose!
Du-te la dracu 'LSU

#176
MrGamecockFan

MrGamecockFan
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    2,755
  • Age:
    38
  • Joined:
    May 2008
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    412

View Postbbqit, on 24 March 2014 - 04:13 PM, said:

We ain't gonna lose!
you will if we beat you in the sec title game!
Go Cocks!!!

2012 Homer of the Year 1st Loser (AKA Runner-Up)

#177
DJSdawg

DJSdawg
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    1,203
  • Joined:
    Oct 2012
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    153

View PostJohnRambo, on 23 March 2014 - 09:29 PM, said:

Here we go again with this mess. SC scored on all but two drives in that game. One of those drives was by Thompson, the other was a kneel down. Kentucky was never close to winning because we established early on that if we needed to, we could have produced more TDs and less FGs.
This was established when we were up by 4 scores lightening fast. Its not uncommon that when a team gets up so huge for the other team to chip away. Considering on defense youre putting your younger guys out there to get some playing time.
No one other than Pudding Time actually thought that Kentucky automatically became good magically after being down by like a million points early. Eerily similar scenario with the Vandy game.
Only Vandys defense actually started stopping us.

The UCF game worried me mainly because Bortles was a good QB and we kind of sputtered.


I sense a theme in the bold.

Be thankful you had Shaw there to run very well when it became a 6 point game in the 4th Q. SC went 35+ minutes without scoring a TD, so lets not act like yall were an unstoppable force on offense.

#178
DJSdawg

DJSdawg
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    1,203
  • Joined:
    Oct 2012
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    153

View Postsmokeyone, on 23 March 2014 - 07:43 AM, said:

As opposed to DJ that is afraid of the massive backlash and ridicule that happened 6 years ago, the last time he put forth an original opinion or specific prediction on UGA football. At best you might back him into a corner and get a 5 five game range of possible UGA records. He prefers to read a box score and pretend the actual game didn't happen.

Its a shame you dont understand what box scores are. They can be quite useful when discussing games because they tell you all about what happened during a game, but only if you prefer to use facts. The only chance you usually ever have of being correct is when unpredictable things occur like special teams mistakes, injuries, fumbles and bad ref calls. When wacky stuff like that doesnt go down, your 13-16 predictions turn into 25-4, which is embarrassinly bad.

Edited by DJSdawg, 24 March 2014 - 11:55 PM.


#179
MrGamecockFan

MrGamecockFan
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    2,755
  • Age:
    38
  • Joined:
    May 2008
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    412

View PostDJSdawg, on 24 March 2014 - 11:11 PM, said:

I sense a theme in the bold.

Be thankful you had Shaw there to run very well when it became a 6 point game in the 4th Q. SC went 35+ minutes without scoring a TD, so lets not act like yall were an unstoppable force on offense.
seeing as how you completely missed the point of his post, let me say it again...it doesn't matter how long we we went without scoring as we had the game in control, and didn't need to run up the score. we were also playing with backups, you know to build depth, but as a dog fan im sure stuff like that is over your head!
Go Cocks!!!

2012 Homer of the Year 1st Loser (AKA Runner-Up)

#180
DJSdawg

DJSdawg
  • Members
  • PipPip
  • Posts:
    1,203
  • Joined:
    Oct 2012
  • Cash:
    1,000
  • High Fives:
    153

View PostMrGamecockFan, on 25 March 2014 - 12:03 AM, said:

seeing as how you completely missed the point of his post, let me say it again...it doesn't matter how long we we went without scoring as we had the game in control, and didn't need to run up the score. we were also playing with backups, you know to build depth, but as a dog fan im sure stuff like that is over your head!

When a big lead shrinks to 6 points, its kind of a stretch to claim the game is "under control". It was a weak point just as your "backup" point is.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users