RammaJamma, on 31 December 2013 - 08:37 PM, said:
They didn't win a game last year this year they do have a better team but if you don't think a little luck like Georgia, Florida, and maybe even Tennessee being injured not their normal self had something to do with Mizzou....... you of all people should know luck tip balls, last second comebacks against MSU, multiple field goals missed, etc... but that was all dominance right Rainman?
Any team may come in and compete for a year but avg over 8-10 years aTm will be battling MSU for 4th and Mizzou... Vandy and Kentucky
Last year Mizzou was the team with all the injuries so no! I don't see it being a pure luck factor. Tennessee was their normal self as of late, aka bad.
By the way, how's that 2009 lucky championship treating you? You wanna talk about blocked FGs and fortuitous injuries? Talk about your 2009 championship.
Every team gets lucky at some point if they win it all.
Tider27, on 18 November 2013 - 07:31 PM, said:
We won't have to stack the box, our athletes are better. Read the first sentence, Auburn won't have over 175. Bet anything you want, it's not gonna happen. That's the one thing Bama can do without a doubt 100% mark it down, and have been for years.
Tider27, on 18 November 2013 - 08:19 PM, said:
If you're going to bet, it will be longer than signing day. This is a rivalry that lasts 365 days, you would have to at least keep it until next football season or this isn't even worth mentioning. Besides, Bama could be winning late in the game and the scrubs get the 200.
Either way, it won't be happening to Bama's defense.