smokeyone, on 17 August 2013 - 10:19 AM, said:
So you don't think the enmasse defense of Boyd has nothing to do with Vandy football expectations and is based totally on his presumed innocence? Dude is connected to the rape of an unconscious girl at the request of her Vandy football player boyfriend by 3 of his team mates. Making excuses and defending him has now replaced we don't tolerate such behavior at Vandy.
You don't have to respond I'm out of the thread for a while.
You asked the question, so I'll respond.
Brandon Vandenburg, was a projected starter. If you see the VUFB depth chart, you'll see we are really thin at TE.
I've not seen tweet or post in defense of BV. Or any of the other 3 for that matter. Batey, a local kid, was going to see time at S. another spot we are really thin. Haven't seen an outpour of support for him either.
Want to know what I think happened? BV or one of the defendants texted Boyd, a picture of the naked girl. And his response might have been, "dude you need to delete that"
Now, if you call that advising a cover up, then I don't really know what else to tell you.
If I didn't believe Boyd was innocent, I wouldn't support him. Regardless if he is a starting WR or the 3rd string long snapper.