J Banks 40 time - Page 2 - Mississippi State Sports - SECTalk.com - Page 2

Jump to content

Welcome to SECTalk.com

Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The Home of 6 Straight National Titles!

You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, sports betting, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!

If you have any problems registering or signing in, please contact us.

Countdown to Kickoff
3310428
DaysHoursMinutesSeconds
Countdown Jersey Thread


Latest Topics


Latest News


Top High Fived

Top Bettors


J Banks 40 time

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
43 replies to this topic

#16
JDawg

JDawg

    I'm from the LANDMASS

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    10,866
  • Joined:
    Mar 2005
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    6,741

View PostColonel Black Bear, on 27 February 2013 - 12:23 PM, said:

Height and length are tangible.

Touche'.  "Unteachables" would be a better word prob.

FIRE EVERYONE


#17
JDawg

JDawg

    I'm from the LANDMASS

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    10,866
  • Joined:
    Mar 2005
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    6,741

View PostRebelFan4Life, on 27 February 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:

Lmao oh boy

LMAO!!111!!!!!&^$&^$!&@^ PISSING MATCH

FIRE EVERYONE


#18
The Doctor

The Doctor

    Wibbly Wobbley Timey Wimey

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,646
  • Joined:
    Aug 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,261
We are measuring athletes length now? My lady friends always told me girth was the better attribute.

#19
Weston M

Weston M

    I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    1,379
  • Joined:
    Dec 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    332

View PostRebelFan4Life, on 27 February 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:

Lmao oh boy

(Had no idea the difference between tangible and intangible)

Posted Image


#20
1dawgfan09

1dawgfan09

    Go strong or don't go.....

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    13,092
  • Joined:
    Dec 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    5,708

View PostThe Doctor, on 27 February 2013 - 12:49 PM, said:

We are measuring athletes length now? My lady friends always told me girth was the better attribute.

You've got to hold on to a woman that spares your feelings.....
Posted Image

#21
shamoan

shamoan

    Omaha bound.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    12,755
  • Joined:
    Jul 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    5,267
its not like he was looking over his shoulder at teo', but there is usually a trade-off between height and speed and dude is 6'2".  i say late first round or early second.  we got a decent shot to make it 3 first rounders in a row and it also has to mesh with team needs.

a quick search on the internet showed that dee milliner had a "poor showing" on speed drills during the combine.....and how that poor showing wont affect his draft status.  in the end, its gonna be a judgment call based on need.  hes still being reported in the top 32 prospects, so lets not get too crazy.

#22
The Doctor

The Doctor

    Wibbly Wobbley Timey Wimey

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,646
  • Joined:
    Aug 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,261
FWIW I still think banks goes first round. One bad showing doesn't negate a body of solid work.

#23
Colonel Black Bear

Colonel Black Bear
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    1,654
  • Joined:
    Sep 2012
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    934
IMO he won't go first round because this is one of the deepest CB classes in a while.  There is a lot of good talent out there that all have Mid First-Late Second round grades.

#24
bulldawg28

bulldawg28
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,312
  • Joined:
    Feb 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    1,584

View PostColonel Black Bear, on 27 February 2013 - 12:23 PM, said:



Height and length are tangible.

Well good he has that too. He's officially a first round lock now!!!

#25
shamoan

shamoan

    Omaha bound.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    12,755
  • Joined:
    Jul 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    5,267
also, notice the disparity between his two times.....4.61 as his high and 4.68 as his second.....you only get two shots at it and one was a full .07 quicker than the other.  im sure hes capable of 4.58 or 4.59, but the disparity between the two tells me that he is not a great 40 sprinter.  had they both been remotely close, i would feel differently, but thats a huge gap.

#26
bulldawg28

bulldawg28
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,312
  • Joined:
    Feb 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    1,584
Technique alone can get him a 4.5 from where he is now.

#27
GoldenRebel

GoldenRebel

    A Proud Swayze Crazy

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    18,860
  • Joined:
    May 2007
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    8,544
Jamie collins ran a 4.6 and hes a 250 lb de/lb. but we all knew Banks was slow. He is just good enough to combat that with bumping and close coverage

#28
bulldawg28

bulldawg28
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,312
  • Joined:
    Feb 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    1,584

View PostGoldenRebel, on 01 March 2013 - 04:05 PM, said:

Jamie collins ran a 4.6 and hes a 250 lb de/lb. but we all knew Banks was slow. He is just good enough to combat that with bumping and close coverage

You won't have close coverage if your slow.

Edited by bulldawg28, 01 March 2013 - 04:37 PM.


#29
GoldenRebel

GoldenRebel

    A Proud Swayze Crazy

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    18,860
  • Joined:
    May 2007
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    8,544

View Postbulldawg28, on 01 March 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:



You won't have close coverage if your slow.

You can if you jam them at the line and dont let them reach top speed. Aint no way Banks can cover some of those 4.3 guys without jamming them

#30
bulldawg28

bulldawg28
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    4,312
  • Joined:
    Feb 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    1,584

View PostGoldenRebel, on 01 March 2013 - 04:48 PM, said:



You can if you jam them at the line and dont let them reach top speed. Aint no way Banks can cover some of those 4.3 guys without jamming them

True. Only the Deion Sanders of the world don't have that problem. It's one of the reasons Banks is a top DB because he CAN get his hands on just about any WR in press.