we go from Conference Expansion to - Page 3 - SEC Football Talk - SECTalk.com - Page 3

Jump to content

Welcome to SECTalk.com

Welcome to SECTalk.com -- The Home of 6 Straight National Titles!

You are currently accessing our site as a guest which means you can't access all of our features such as social groups, sports betting, and many more. By joining our free community you will have access to all of these great features as well as to participating in our forums, contacting other members, and much more. Registration only takes a minute and SECTalk.com is absolutely free, so please join today!

If you have any problems registering or signing in, please contact us.


we go from Conference Expansion to

- - - - -

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
40 replies to this topic

#31
Gidnik

Gidnik
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    5,153
  • Joined:
    Aug 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,451
I dont hate the idea. its basically going to the NFL model of conferences. its at 4 teams now but itll go to 6 teams as a playoff pretty soon, once everyone realizes how much money is to be made.
Posted Image

#32
MizzouMark

MizzouMark
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    3,945
  • Joined:
    Jan 2012
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,784

View Postzartan, on 26 January 2013 - 03:49 PM, said:

PT is right. Go back to the 2010 settings

Posted Image


Honestly I think over time Mizzou and aTm are going to be pretty powerful SEC additions, no homer, we're the only FBS school in our state and aTm is the only texas SEC school... Mizzou's main problem was injuries last season, I think we're considerably better this year if we stay healthy.

View PostLarge Marge, on 16 August 2014 - 09:21 AM, said:

I would suck a fart out of her ass and hold it in like a bong hit
Posted Image

#33
zartan

zartan

    Troll Tide

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    19,302
  • Joined:
    Nov 2007
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    7,483
Mizzou makes more sense in a conference with Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa State. It just does
Posted Image

#34
Gidnik

Gidnik
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    5,153
  • Joined:
    Aug 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,451
Rumor has it that Tennessee will be joining conference usa. Immediately becoming the 4th best team in the conference

























:trollface:
Posted Image

#35
A10Rebel

A10Rebel
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    3,506
  • Joined:
    Sep 2011
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    2,343
I hate this.  This is such a stupid idea.  We all suck outside the SEC so lets all band together so we can pump each other in harmony.

#36
smokeyone

smokeyone

    Descendant of a Lord of the Manner in Berkshire.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    9,507
  • Joined:
    Jul 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,495
so without central scheduling we are going to selectivly reduce the number of teams we can play and increase the teams we split TV money with. And this makes sense to someone in respect to a benefit to the SEC?

Redacted


#37
SheLuvsBama

SheLuvsBama

    Take the highway to the end of the night

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    10,469
  • Joined:
    Jan 2007
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    2,153
I'm getting tired of all of it. What are these brilliant minds going to think up next to destroy something good? They keep trying.
Posted Image

#38
smokeyone

smokeyone

    Descendant of a Lord of the Manner in Berkshire.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    9,507
  • Joined:
    Jul 2010
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    3,495
and if BCS does the scheduling and divys out the money why not set the rules too? They already name the winner. Why not set aside the NCAA and go with the group with skin in the game right?

Redacted


#39
Stefanozz

Stefanozz
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    1,244
  • Joined:
    Dec 2012
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    1,225
At the moment, this is just a Big12 Rep blowing smoke about a meeting the Big12 will have.  I'd wager little if anything comes from this.
Posted Image

#40
ALA2262

ALA2262
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    1,285
  • Joined:
    Sep 2009
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    297

View PostPuddingTime, on 26 January 2013 - 07:17 AM, said:

Just go back to how conferences were before this started.  West Virginia in the same conference as Kansas and Texas is flat out stupid.

Louisville, Boston College, and Miami are now in the same conference (again, I guess you can say.)

Geographical regions, institute a playoff like EVERY OTHER DAMN SPORT IN EXISTENCE, and be done with it.

That's what should have happened.  Now it's too late....the ball is rolling and the new playoff has folks scrambling to get a piece of that pie.

No offense to you purists but the bowl system has always sucked.

I loved the Bowl system when Coach Bryant got UK a Sugar Bowl bid by guaranteeing UK would beat high and mighty Oklahoma. And then did it.

Edited by ALA2262, 29 January 2013 - 09:00 AM.


#41
bbqit

bbqit
  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Posts:
    17,258
  • Joined:
    Dec 2004
  • Cash:
    0
  • High Fives:
    6,254
the big 12 is solid except for the fact that in time they will be hurting for more teams. the acc is a caught turkey the day before thanksgiving. the big east is a plucked chicken.
Du-te la dracu 'LSU