HobnailedBoots, on 02 January 2013 - 06:53 PM, said:
What a complete load of horseshit. Their time in college benefits them just as much as anyone. Otherwise they could do just as I suggested and go work at McDonald's for three years. Not fair? What are you? An Obama lib? Is it unfair that many jobs can't be had without a college degree? By your logic, any job that requires a degree is taking advantage of a student because it benefits the employer by the student getting educated in college while the college gets the student's money. It's unfair!
Same :lanekiffin:ing logic. You still sound ridiculous. Like anything else in this world, you have to put in the time and effort before you "have it all."
You're reaching. Like I said, I know from personal knowledge, the "requirements" in the "real world" are not set in stone. It's a tool listed on postings to try and filter candidates out, through faceless resumes. If a person shows true work experience or can prove they posses the ability or have the knowledge to complete a job, you think someone isn't going to hire them after an interview over someone that can't do the job but has a degree? These are general guidelines that are often broken.
You think Clowney hasn't proven he's ready for the next level? You pretend like I said, they should just give a tall guy, who is athletic a first round contract....they've put in the time and effort for 2 years, and should continue to at the next level.
And if you really believe that extra "time in college" benefits Clowney more than the millions he could be getting by getting drafted this year....well talk about faulty logic.
In the real world proven ability trumps some piece of paper, and in the football world, the same proven ability should trump some 3rd year technicality rule. There are and should be exceptions to every rule, which is why this rule is stupid
Edited by M2J, 02 January 2013 - 07:04 PM.